2007-02-19 00:08:00 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Well honestly no i dont think so. Im sure she will be known and/or remembered in the next few decades, but not by many in the later future. I mean she's no audrey hepburn or marilyn monroe. But who knows, it could be possible.
2007-02-19 00:18:09 · answer #1 · answered by Lenna O 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
An historical disaster of biblical proportions perhaps.
2007-02-19 08:16:18 · answer #2 · answered by GeneL 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not really, she is hot, but very strange. She is a train wreck, which makes for good reading material in the weekly Mags.
2007-02-19 08:16:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hell. I barely consider her a person. She is a waste of human skin with no redeeming value to society.
2007-02-19 18:38:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes she will be known as the person that began the fall of westen civilization. Her along with Brittany, Nicole Ritchie, reality show stars, and American Idol, will be our demise.
2007-02-19 09:09:02 · answer #5 · answered by bruin_31_00 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
She is not worthy for any consideration. The primary criteria for questions such as this one is to ask yourself, "Do you want this person as a role model for your children." Clearly, in this context she has no redeeming attributes.
2007-02-19 08:39:45 · answer #6 · answered by Randy 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
she is a rich spoiled brat, she's ugly and has the body of an 10 year old boy
2007-02-19 08:12:12 · answer #7 · answered by koleary388 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course. She's created havoc. She shall be remembered, but she won't have anything written about her. Nobody cares THAT much.
2007-02-19 08:25:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No- she's done nothing so far meriting historical significance.
2007-02-19 09:25:22 · answer #9 · answered by cooper243 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
worthless flavor of the month, not even a footnote
2007-02-19 19:57:31 · answer #10 · answered by cav 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋