so as to keep the peacekeeping in operational order....
2007-02-18 23:27:32 · 10 answers · asked by herman w 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
No 2 terms are enough. If we extend it for him, then some democrat would want the same treatment.
2007-02-18 23:33:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I was only a gradeschool kid then but as I recall, I saw President Eisenhower age before our eyes in films and newspapers, and again, recall, he led the call that Presidents should be limited to two terms. Two term limit is just about right as I see it still today.
2007-02-18 23:51:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the people choose it yes. I never did understand the American law that allows a President in for a maximum of 2 terms(mind you it would've helped the UK to get rid of Blair). What if everybody's happy with him or her,what if the candidates for the next election don't appeal to you? Change that law if ya can!
2007-02-19 00:11:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
this is a joke right?! Someone really believes BUsh the war monger is now a peace keeper? Please read your history, WAR IS ALWAYS OVER RESOURCES, everything else is just spin. It has been going on for , forever. It was not the face of Helen that launched a thousand ships, it was control of the trade routes. it was true then and it is true now, unless this is the one time in history that a war was not over the control of resources. and it just so happened to be one of the richest country in natural resources.
Good Job GW, keeping us safe form terrorists buy dropping bombs on peoples families. keep it up!
2007-02-18 23:38:46 · answer #4 · answered by robert f 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
He should serve 4 years as president but not here. If he's such a wonderful leader then send him to Iraq.
2007-02-18 23:52:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Are you insane? He has already done more damage to this country in six years than we will be able to fix in the next fifty years.Your Great Grandchildren will be paying off this war when they are old enough to vote.We were lied to when we went into this mess.
2007-02-18 23:44:34 · answer #6 · answered by silverfox13007 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Absolutely. In fact, I think he should serve five-to-ten without option for parole. And he should take that idiot Cheney with him. I mean the only thing the Big Dick has done right is shoot a lawyer. :)
2007-02-18 23:40:33 · answer #7 · answered by Meg W 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
seeing as how he's in his 2nd term....no. even if he was aloud to run again, I doubt he'd get reelected
2007-02-18 23:35:19 · answer #8 · answered by dixiegirl687 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You mean in Jail?
2007-02-18 23:32:49 · answer #9 · answered by ★Greed★ 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
no way.george bush has destroyed many lives already
2007-02-18 23:35:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋