Don't you think The Undertaker and Kane Should be world/wwe champions and not Batista and John Cena?

Question

I do Kane is one of the best wrestlers ever and he's only held the world title once and The Undertaker deseves the world title again before he retires.

Answer 1

right on my friend,kane has been in the bussines since 1993 and only has been champ 1 time.and batista and cena they have less than 6 years and cena is a 3 time and batista a 2 time champs whats up with that?i think kane deserves more.

Answer 2

Yes, Kane is the best, he made Umaga run out the ring a lot and burned MVP butt and beat up King Booger and is about to go against the Khali. The Undertaker already beat the Khali and a good match would be The Brothers of Destruction -vs- Khali and Umaga. Of course the Brothers of Destruction will win

Answer 3

Undertaker will win the World Heavyweight championship before he retires at WM 23. Kane will not win the WWE championship, though. Kane only held the WWE championship for 24 hours about throughout his whole career.

Answer 4

Thats why we would desire to resign those Jeff Hardy v. MVP uninteresting suits. THe followers wanna see something huge. Like 2 tremendous tag communities jointly. additionally 4 adult adult males which could kinda be viewed as faces to top it off. Undertaker and Kane is greater ideal tho. :)

Answer 5

Both guys are on smackdown so it isn't possible. Kane lost his first world title the next day so i don't know about him being champ.

Answer 6

i certainly agree with you. but who becomes champ is really up to the management and creative team.

Answer 7

they should be because they are much stronger but i like john cena the most.

Answer 8

ya!!!!