1. Can those who oppose sex ed in schools guarantee that the parents will teach their kids at home?
2. Of the parents that will teach their kids at home, can they guarantee that they are up to date with the statistics of disease and viruses that are running rampant in teenagers?
3. Will the parents that are up to date on #2 also teach that if you do have sex "and some will" teach how to use protection, or will they just assume that "their little darlings" would never have sex?
2007-02-18 21:56:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mrs. T 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ah so some kind of formal debate? Hmm... these would be my possible questions...
* IS it wrong to be educated about human sexuality which occurs naturally? Or would it be right to contribute to this bulging population of ours, just because of IGNORANCE?
* When would you want to learn? When everything else is already too late? Or at a period of time where you could correct the negative results, which could save an innocent life?
* What can you say about abortionism? (Then when he/she answers, tell the crowd that this could be prevented if that person was educated)
*In what other ways can you stop this rapid increase of population around the world?
2007-02-18 22:10:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Klyde L 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Here are questions/guidelines you might use:
Think of consequences that premarital sex / unguarded sex or irresponsible sexual actions produce (i.e. std's, early pregnancy/ unprepared parenthood/ marriage for both sides of the party, w/c could produce more societal problems like broken homes and juvenile delinquents, poverty etc. etc.
Remember that what you could count on is probability... you are on an advantageous side and you have lots on your side... so goodluck!
Then you can begin your question by stating a social problem brought about by this consequences (i.e. broken homes and their effects to children, and STD's)
1. You can ask what is the sickness that causes too much death around the world? STD should come up...
2. Why are so many people being victimized by STD? Of course, maleducation in sex is one of the major answer, so then you can point out the importance of sex ed
3. Then you could ask questions about the consequences of having no proper education about sex to family life (like unprepared marriages, w/c could result to broken homes, or too many children, w/c could end up to poverty...and children who grew up w/o proper attention
2007-02-18 22:19:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by blue_raven 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You could ask them if they would prefer their children to learn about sex from an informed mature adult or from t.v programs and other kids their age.
If they argue that sex education should happen at home you should ask them what age is appropriate. If they can't give an exact age then argue that some kids will learn before others and then spread their knowledge before other parents have a chance to sit their kids down.
2007-02-18 21:54:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Diet_smartie 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
it relatively is goin on at my youngster's college staggering now. this is small and private and the class is co-ed. They informed the youngsters there is not any such element as a stupid question. They have been incorrect. the youngsters are 13, meaning the lads have been downloading porn for 2 years and the ladies take topless photos with their telephones. i think of this is hysterical simply by fact i easily knowledgeable my youngster in the previous she have been given the telephone and pc. those little ones torture the damaging woman. the 1st question replaced into "Do all ladies have vibrators?" this is purely gotten extra desirable. i think of intercourse training might desire to learn at school in the previous they have a larger porn series than their mothers and fathers.
2016-10-02 09:19:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
should sex education be treated as a science subject? or a home ecconomics excersise? morrally is it right to teach kids about sexs and it's related hazzards( std's kids, deadbeat dads, etc), or is it better to leave that to the parents and hope those parents aren't the people who fall into the above category ( kids, deadbeat dads etc)?
never mind to morals, with population exploding the way it is, can we afford more unwanted, un planned kids in this society?
2007-02-18 21:58:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by aussiegeezer 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ask about the consequences that would undoubtedly arise from not teaching teenagers sex ed -
*Rise in STD's
*Teen pregnancies
*Abortion rates
*Shattering of 'family values' - destruction of the nuclear family
Leave the church to tell us how to be good, and let the schools teach us how to be careful.
Lx
Lx
2007-02-18 22:08:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Lauren A 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It should be up to the parents...but since parents dont know how to raise kids ne more, I guess the school has too
2007-02-18 21:49:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
it is ok...considering the maturity of the students...perhaps for the higher year...
2007-02-18 22:03:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by adis2x 1 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
ofcourse it is a debatable topic
2007-02-18 21:50:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by miss A 1
·
0⤊
1⤋