explain briefly
2007-02-18 21:13:55 · 7 answers · asked by bratty14 1 in Health ➔ Alternative Medicine
yes - you wont need a cure if you prevented it
2007-02-18 21:17:39 · answer #1 · answered by waltzing matilda 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
depends on the risks. costs, and benfits of prevention vs treatment. if its a minor disease thats easy to treat and not that common, might be more beneficial to just cure it. sort of like an infection- you just take antibiotics when you get sick rather than taking them all the time. but yeah often its best to prevent things before they happen
2007-02-19 07:31:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is English your primary language? I'm not sure what your asking. If you use prevention, than a cure isn't necessary.
2007-02-19 22:56:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In general - YES
BUT I have recently heard of research that shows that kids of the more affluent are the ones who do not get as many colds and exposure to things when they are young which seems to lead to more respiratory problems whether asthma, allergies or other.
2007-02-22 22:08:18 · answer #4 · answered by Keko 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
absolutely prevention is always better than cure ....always avoid trouble when ever possible ...the cure will always be less pain full than the cure
2007-02-19 05:23:55 · answer #5 · answered by Norm G 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Certain things are incurable, so prevention will save you time, money, suffering and or death.
2007-02-19 16:58:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
depends, some preventions are dangerous in themselves
2007-02-19 06:42:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋