I know this is nothing new but I thought I’d write it down anyway.
J W Bush is (reacting) just like a “terrorist” In the way that with out their ‘little’ wars, rackets ect. They’re nothing. So they keep on provoking all attempts at peace with their bombings murders, hijackings and kidnappings. Bush has, or is nothing (politically speaking) without his pet phrase “TERROIST”
His whole “campaign” has been based on that word since, luckily for him the 11 Sept. ”happened”
Now he’s on the decline and cannot be r-elected. The only thing he can do is to keep the pot boiling by refusing the Palestinians, accusing the Iranians, siding with the Israeliens and playing with North Corea…because it’s a little too close to China. Generally making havoc in the world… just trying to prove his/a point…. Because like a terrorist, without terror he and his administration would be out of a job… and the Arms (Dick Cheney) and Oil Barons (Bush Family) would lose Billons? Therefore is GW Bush one of the biggest “Peacetime” terrorist’s of all time?
2007-02-18 21:02:09 · 9 answers · asked by Fishtalk 4 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
NO but you are one of the biggest liberal nitwits of "all time". Stop drinking George Soros's Move On.org Kool Aid.
2007-02-18 22:24:44 · answer #1 · answered by mr_methane_gasman 3 · 1⤊ 4⤋
So you say... he will not be re-elected, maybe they will declare his first election void, because it was.
Remember all those people that were not allowed to vote because their neighbour two doors down was a shoplifter in Alabama 10 years before or had postal votes accepted after the deadline because they were at sea on a big warship but they would have voted Bush if someone had reminded them.
This would mean that he was eligible for re-election a second time as the first time did not count.... Is everyone following me here?
This does seem a bit complicated, its more likely that he'll attack Iran then change the rules to ensure that a "wartime President" stays in power till the war is over. And we all know how long this war on "Terrrism" is expected to last.
Any way there is still a few other members of the family who haven't got to be the Big Cheese yet.
2007-02-22 04:55:22 · answer #2 · answered by shinarocka 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that's a dirversion to maintain the folk at midnight approximately who incredibly did 9-11. and that i served in the militia, so i wish i meet you on the line additionally to teach you. you have seen what they prefer you to work out, enhance up, get knowledgeable and then communicate trash. Why would would a real patriot threaten the very human beings he's sworn to guard and the liberty of speach (shape) you supposedly safeguard? and you're meant to look after it against ALL enemies foreign places and companion and infants! look into the data and spot who who the actual terrorist are! they are in the White domicile, no longer in a cave with a laptop! in case you're in the militia with this physique of concepts, you're incorrect! era! The politicians do no longer care approximately you or me. OIL no longer OBL is what it incredibly is approximately! And as a techniques because of the fact the "LIBERAL" B.S. i'm no longer left or top wing. i'm for the EAGLE! that's incredibly helpful to objective it. awaken u.s.! or you would be the subsequent purpose! AL-CIA-DA will strike the U.S. lower back.
2016-11-23 18:12:09 · answer #3 · answered by howsare 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think he is a terrorist, I think he is just the result of what happens all the time, all over the world, family pay for the dim child to get a good job etc. he's just not bright enough to do his job, and while he needed to do something - he didn't really understand what. He is not dangerous per se - but putting him in charge of a country could be considered to be
2007-02-22 19:47:22 · answer #4 · answered by jop291106 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, the US president isn't a terrorist. He is a defender of democracy. If a country is attacked, and its people are killed, then it is very unlikely it will do nothing. Bush went into Afghanistan following the attacks on the WTC and because of those attacks. Also, it is worth noting that if there was never any terrorism in Iraq after Saddam Hussein was removed from power, the war there would probably be over. It is the Islamic extremists who are blowing themselves up there, taking the lives of innocent civilians. The US has troops in Germany, and areas of the former Yugoslavia as well as South Korea, Japan, Djibuti and other countries which you didn't mention in your accusation. You don't object, because Islamic extremists aren't killing innocent civilians every day in those countries.
2007-02-19 05:26:29 · answer #5 · answered by waynenigelsenior 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I agree
It is disgracefull to consider that one team of people can cause so much damage for the sake of controlling the oil.
the Loose change videos opened my eyes to the horror that is going on in this world
trillions of dollars - a few thousand deaths
it has been cold heartedly weighed up and decided
one day we will all have to answer for our actions
The loose change video can be watched for free here,
http://www.loose-change-911.com
2007-02-19 00:43:45 · answer #6 · answered by Simon W 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
What Was That Did Someone Say 2 Points?
2007-02-19 03:24:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes and also the most likely person to start a 3rd world war.
2007-02-19 09:22:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i thought Pol Pot was a pushy bastard murdering all the Cambodians.
2007-02-19 00:24:00 · answer #9 · answered by marzmargs12 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋