2007-02-18 20:51:51 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
After looking at coments of "naan" n "macruadhi", I would like the readers to ignore the second part of my question...
2007-02-18 21:08:44 · update #1
So one follows the other? If Obama does not succeed, you pull out the shallow race issue? You should move away from here. America doesn't need you.
If Obama does not win, it will be because he has too little experience, a glitch could be found in his background, or - and this will most likely be the reason - Billary gets the nomination.
2007-02-18 21:33:03 · answer #1 · answered by su·i ge·ne·ris 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
HOLD IT! Your question is not only loaded but also slanted by virtue of your prejudicial wording; one does NOT necessarily follow the other simply because YOU say so!
Americans should vote and elect the most competent, ethical, experienced, progressive and knowledgeable individual... Americans should vote on perceived competence and skills, abilities and NOT on ethnic or gender issues. To do otherwise would be silly, ridiculous, asinine, facetious and plain stupid!
IF Mr. Obama is the best candidate, then by all means he should elected on merit, not by virtue of his ethnicity or gender. But, it's still early and there are others who will no doubt wish to run for the office of the Presidency, and it is our responsibility to hear them all before we decide.
Inasmuch as I am disgusted with the present administration (and many things that have occurred), I would not vote automatically for the opposing party (inasmuch as I love to poke fun of whoever is in office). I much prefer to hear what they ALL have to say and hope I can select the lesser of all the evils... I say this because we, the public, do not select our candidates; they are selected for us by party bosses in smoked filled back rooms of some super rich and powerful organization, the ones that REALLY run and control America and the policies. We only get to play the game of selecting the one with the best Taurus Excresia and the rigged voting machines will select whoever the big bosses want elected. Anyone who doubts this can call his/her elected officials and demand accountability and truth in campaign promises and see what happens...
2007-02-18 21:17:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Obama doesn't get elected, then we must KILL ALL WHITE NEWBORNS! Then and only then will AmeriKKKa cease to be racist.
***I'm white, and that was sarcasm***
Ps. Even though Obama is black, he will never give slave decendants reperations, because I'm pretty sure he wasn't born rich or well educated, it seems that he would hate the idea that a poor African who comes to America with less wealth than the Blacks who're already there, should piss his tax dollars directly into their pockets, either that, or he simply wants to get re-elected, then again, Bush got re-elected, and he's wasted what? A trillion dollars? To blow up some mud brick houses... :/
2007-02-21 00:14:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Initially I thought Obama is a nondescript novice who cannot be a perfect match for the high profile Hillary Clinton. Now that I have known about his humble origin and the prospect of the America proving itself as the most progressive country following the ideals of Abraham Lincoln looming large, I am excited about his candidature.
2007-02-18 21:03:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
So if the democratic process gets someone other than the black guy elected, America suddenly becomes racist?
Look, dude, I'm going to be evaluating this guy's policies just like everybody else's.
2007-02-18 21:00:52 · answer #5 · answered by na n 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The way you worded your question implies that a failure to elect Obama automatically makes the whole of America racist. Therefore it matters not to you what a man believes, rather what to what race he belongs. And that, Sir, makes you the racist.
2007-02-18 21:03:31 · answer #6 · answered by macruadhi 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
neither he will not get the nomination based on the issues and a lack of experinece, I do look for him to be a vp candidate ont he dem ticket though
2007-02-18 22:11:38 · answer #7 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
He is bad for America.
2007-02-18 20:58:20 · answer #8 · answered by a bush family member 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
THE CHANCES OF HIS BECOMING THE PRESIDENT ARE BLEAK. HILLARY CLINTON HAS MORE CHANCES TO WIN THE POST.
2007-02-20 06:14:39 · answer #9 · answered by nightingale 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You mean Obama or Osama?
Bush cannot be replaced by either of the two.
Happy?
If not you, Bush is.
2007-02-18 21:00:45 · answer #10 · answered by Saadi 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋