English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Mr jawahar lal Nehru and Mr Liyakat Ali Signed agreement on partition based on religion during 1947. Consequent to the agreement all Hindus lost the right of property in North West India now pakistan. In fact they were killed , thrown dragged out from Pakistan. They were denied the right of life. None of the governments/ Leaders recognised their rights of life and property. No consent on the subject was taken from Hindus by the so called leadership. Why? why such leaders were and are being considered representatives of Hindus. Hindus were again subjected to partition of Punjab during end 60s based on language (but truely religion ) and were dragged out to Haryana. Similar phenmenon occured in kashmir also

2007-02-18 18:27:55 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

5 answers

You must lament for not heeding the sage advice of Gandhi. Whatever be the cost, we ought not to have agreed for partition. The Muslim League was for direct action, meaning resorting to riots and violence, which they did in any case, even after agreeing to partition. The Congress leaders, minus Gandhi were tired of continuing with struggle any more. The British wanted leave India, much before the stipulated time, come what may. The result was every body to see. Not only millions of innocent lives were lost; we have created a permanent enemy on either side of our country. Within India, the Muslims are ever regarded as anti-nationals.

2007-02-18 18:33:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Political leadership of India was weak enabling the Muslims to secede into Pakistan. The Hindus must not have agreed on this situation because those who were displaced were pitiful. Another separation of territory might happen with the case of Kashmir.

2007-02-18 18:32:29 · answer #2 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0 0

you will possibly desire to lament for no longer heeding the sage advice of Gandhi. despite be the fee, we would desire to no longer have agreed for partition. The Muslim League replaced into for direct action, meaning resorting to riots and violence, which they did in spite of everything, even after agreeing to partition. The Congress leaders, minus Gandhi have been bored with persevering with with conflict to any extent further. The British needed go away India, lots in the previous the stipulated time, come what might. the effect replaced into each and every physique to confirm. no longer purely thousands and thousands of harmless lives have been lost; we've created an everlasting enemy on the two area of our u . s .. interior of India, the Muslims are ever recognized as anti-nationals.

2016-10-02 09:14:14 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

its all about the wickedness of our former political leaders they only want the power so they splited india based on the reliegion

2007-02-18 18:42:05 · answer #4 · answered by visakh gopinath 1 · 0 0

....they were very much eager to gain the control(musnad) in a "come what may" situation.

2007-02-18 18:40:51 · answer #5 · answered by saumitra s 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers