Why did political leadership partitioned secular India based on religion during 1947?

Question

Mr jawahar lal Nehru and Mr Liyakat Ali Signed agreement on partition based on religion during 1947. Consequent to the agreement all Hindus lost the right of property in North West India now pakistan. In fact they were killed , thrown dragged out from Pakistan. They were denied the right of life. None of the governments/ Leaders recognised their rights of life and property. No consent on the subject was taken from Hindus by the so called leadership. Why? why such leaders were and are being considered representatives of Hindus. Hindus were again subjected to partition of Punjab during end 60s based on language (but truely religion ) and were dragged out to Haryana. Similar phenmenon occured in kashmir also

Answer 1

1) Because of the British policy of "divide and rule". British policy also aimed at setting of Hindus against Muslims.`
British colonial authorities decided to partition Bengal as early as 1905.
Weaken the state and it is easy to control and rule. This was the philosophy of the then British rulers . They were unwilling to leave India undivided, otherwise India will become stronger sooner or later. That was their thinking when they left India after 15th august 1947.
Sir Winston Churchil, the British premier then was against granting of freedom to India and he wanted to see India weakened at least.
2)The Mount batten plan and the partition of India with the creation of two dominions ,the Indian Union and the Pakistan ,was approved both by the National Congress and the Muslim League. But, in order to complicate the relations between the two parties, the British provoked clashes between the Hindus and the Muslims,which were particularly serious in the Punjab.
The question as to the partition of Punjab and Bengal on religious grounds was to be decided byseparate votes cast by deputies from those parts of the provinces concerned where there was a prevailing majority of Hindus or Muslims.
3)Mohammed AliJinnah and Muslims fell into the traps laid by the British ,for partitioning India, and the Muslims united under Jinnah did not listen to Gamdhiji's words of wisdom and truth and Jinnah wanted to head a nation at any cost (millons of lives including that of Gandhiji). As he wished ,Mohammed Ali Jinnah became the first premier and 'father of the nation' for the newly formed Pakistan,then.
4)Niether was Gandhiji able to convince the Congress, to find a common leader for undivided India ,acceptable to both the Hindus and the Muslims

Answer 2

You must lament for not heeding the sage advice of Gandhi. Whatever be the cost, we ought not to have agreed for partition. The Muslim League was for direct action, meaning resorting to riots and violence, which they did in any case, even after agreeing to partition. The Congress leaders, minus Gandhi were tired of continuing with struggle any more. The British wanted leave India, much before the stipulated time, come what may. The result was every body to see. Not only millions of innocent lives were lost; we have created a permanent enemy on either side of our country. Within India, the Muslims are ever regarded as anti-nationals.

Answer 3

Political management of India replaced into susceptible permitting the Muslims to secede into Pakistan. The Hindus wouldn't have agreed in this challenge simply by fact people who have been displaced have been pitiful. yet another separation of territory might ensue with the case of Kashmir.

Answer 4

If your professor knew you were soliciting answers for your homework online, you'd probably get booted out of school.
Read the assignment and do your own damn homework, young man!