why does every one hate oj simpson wasnt he found not guilty is it because he was accused of killing?

Question

why does every one hate oj simpson wasnt he found not guilty? is it because he was accused of killing a whiteeee women and was found innocent do you think its fair that the media constantly harrases him and the family of ron goldman ad nicole brown are trying to annex his money mind you he was found not guilty not guilty n. 1) verdict after trial by judge sitting without a jury or by jury (unanimous decision in all but two states, which allow a verdict by only 10 of the jurors), stating that the prosecution has not proved the defendant guilty of crime or that it believes the accused person was insane at the time crime was committed. The accused cannot be tried for again for the crime charged

why dont they just leave the man alone.

Answer 1

I completly agree with you. ANd just think I am white. People dont leave him alone because he is famous. If he would of been an ordinary person he would of been forgotten already. The man had enough money if he wanted something done to her he would of just paid someone to do it and I doubt he would of waited so long after thier break up to do it. I feel for the man and for his kids. Mostly for his kids since they had just lost thier mother and then the world tries to take aways thier father even though he was found inocent. The only people who keep on about it are people who dont have a life and have a need to be involved in other peoples lives. They were killed by the people her friend owned money for coke to. There is no way one man could of cut up two people at the same time and no one hear anything. THat would of taken some quick work since obviously while one was getting cut the other would of at least tried to run away and cutting someone the person would of been full of blood . OJ is atheletic but come on he was never all that to of handled taking out two people at the same time. He doesnt have it in him. Hopefully people will let the man be. What really sucks is the people who really did it are still out there and no one even looked for them.

Answer 2

There is a difference in legal terms--just because one is found "not guilty," doesn't mean he is innocent. When one is found "not guilty" it is because usually the jury nullified the verdict, the defense created enough doubt in the mind of the jury, or the prosecution did a lousy job. People are determined "guilty" or "innocent" based on the evidence admited in court--which can be either thrown out based on technicalities or other legal procedures. For instance, if a person has the suspect on film committing the murder, the film can be thrown out because of improper handling of evidence, etc. The suspect did indeed commit the crime, but the jury found him "not guilty" because for the film was not admitted as evidence.

BTW, I am still waiting for OJ to "find" the killers of Nicole just like he promised to do after the trail.

Answer 3

It's the perception that money bought his not guilty verdict....& so much of what he did & said seemed to shout out his guilt. In the criminal trial he was found not guilty, the requirement for a guilty verdict is guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

In the civil trial which followed he was found guilty & liable for monetary damages. The requirement in a civil trial is that a preponderance of the evidence indicates guilt.

Personally I don't hate the man, tho I despise his past behavior as a person inflicting physical abuse on a woman. And I do feel in my heart of hearts that he did commit the murders, which made me very sad, as I had respected OJ's professional career.

P.S. It had nothing to do w race.

Answer 4

well, he was found guilty in the civil trial...and come on the recent book deal thing, "If I had done it, here's how", he is more or less confessing his guilt in a round about way. Its probably eating him up. I just feel bad for the children. They got the worst end of it. I think the media would leave him alone, if that's what he wanted. He wanted to do the show about his book on Fox, but due to public backlash they canceled it...you have to be the judge...sounds guilty to me. Race had nothing to do with it, more of a money thing

Answer 5

because people believe he did it and got away with it because of who he is. i don't believe race played any part other than justification for other blacks that have been wrongly accussed in the past. nicole and ron were a sacrificial lambs basically. if it were your brother or sister, i think you could understand why people feel the way they do. try putting yourself in those shoes and it is quite comprehendable. morality and justice are not mutally exclusive!!!! He WAS found guilty in the civil trial brought against him, then tried the lastest kick in the teeth with the "If I did it" Does that not mean anything???

Answer 6

20 years to life in prison. Two of the felonies he was convicted of were those involving the use of a deadly weapon in commission of a crime. That automatically doubles the sentence. For each offense. And this "gun enhancement" law also puts him in a position where he will have to do 70% of his adjudged sentence before his parole hearing. The media crowd who descended on our Clark County Regional Justice Center don't seem to understand that. We have some tough laws in the Silver State. Including getting life without parole for sexual molestation of a minor. Many years ago a bank vice president from Northern California made the mistake of molesting some young boys. His mistake was using his summer place in Minden. He's doing forty two life without parole sentences back to back.

Answer 7

Because he is guilty. The gloves didn't fit because moisture
creates shrinkage. His blood mixed with Nicole's was in his vehicle and on the bricks of her home, tells me he is guilty. But his high power Attorney Johnny Cochran got him off, but I believe he is deceased now. He is a time-bomb waiting to explode again anytime. I was married to a insanely jealous man just like him. He will create another havoc!

Answer 8

Here's another question... why does the black community rally behind him so much? Do you feel he represents you? He's been a star for the last 35 years and has no more in common with the typical black man than I do.

Rich white people get away with murder too, but I don't feel obligated to justify their actions because they have the same skin color as I do.

IMO when a community rallies behind a man like that, it makes all of you look buffoonish.

Answer 9

Oh give me a break! He was only found not guilty because they didn't want another riot in Los Angeles. Just because he was found not guilty doesn't mean he didn't do it and vice versa. He did it and his money bought a great verdict. He was found not guilty he wasn't found innocent.

Answer 10

Because he is everything but innocent. The defense messed up and made him try on a bloody glove that didnt fit his hand BUT the defense is dumb for doing that because anything blood soaked and allowed drying time shrinks!