English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Most acts of violence have their extreme and most serious adverse implications on women and children. Its extreme poverty and misery that drives most women or children into abusing their own body - their last line of defence. Why then are the governments and corporates hiding this aspect and promoting AIDS awareness, as if its a neutral act or a mistake ?

2007-02-18 15:41:24 · 12 answers · asked by doxa 2 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

12 answers

Governments always look for excuses and scape goats. I agree with your observation.

2007-02-18 15:49:40 · answer #1 · answered by love all 6 · 0 1

I agree with you dear, But not only poverty and the suffering will drive women and children to abuse themselves, there are other factors, may be they might have forced to do that, So these can not be put on a promotional ad which looks very awkward. Just think of the category of viewers of those ads. These are not seen by the so called upper class people. These are often seen by so called the middle class people. Think what may be their response if ads are as you said.

2007-02-18 16:06:11 · answer #2 · answered by rvs 2 · 0 0

Promiscuous sexual behaviour lead to AIDS. In the developed countries, there is awareness about the problem of unprotected sex and hence the low level of AIDS incidents. In the developing countries there is less of awareness and more of poverty which pushes the women into the trade, unmindful of the consequences of unprotected sex. In India, it is a big racket wherein the gullible women are pushed into the trade forcibly. In the west, the law against such immoral trafficking is very stringent and its implementation is very effective.

2007-02-18 16:36:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

May AIDS results due to extreme luxury and over-indulgence.
The govt. is only trying to protect the people, by educating them about avoiding AIDS, they are not providing answer to the question of poverty and misery, which may be dealth by a different body.

2007-02-18 15:49:53 · answer #4 · answered by wizard of the East 7 · 0 0

I had an AIDS speaker come into my high school, his wife past away from AIDS. She was infected with HIV by a blood tranfusion because of delivery complications with her first born. They didn't know until after she had her second baby that she had HIV. Both baby and mother became very ill short after second baby's arrival.

It was not their fault but yet the blood banks? I would not place blame on the victim. "Blaming the victim" is wrong.

I do believe that more MEN AND WOMAN should use barriers before engaging in sex.

But not all HIV/AIDS victims get it from sex....

2007-02-18 15:55:05 · answer #5 · answered by Sara H 1 · 1 0

According to the center for disease control, of new AIDS cases in 2005 in the United States, 58.3% involved male to male sexual contact. Staggering, considering they only make up 2.5% of the population of men. 17.9% involved drug use. Another 6.7% involved both drug use and male sex with other males. 16.1% involved heterosexual risky sex. Finally, less than 1% involved other, which could be blood transfusions or other means.

So to make a long story short, male sex with other men accounts for 65% of new AIDS cases in the U.S. - not sure how poverty enters into that.

2007-02-18 17:35:53 · answer #6 · answered by ace 3 · 0 0

The Aids epidemic is a result of misguidance, ignorance, and lack of education.
You don't need to be promiscuous to get Aids or any other disease some are born with it and things like that.

2007-02-18 17:01:49 · answer #7 · answered by WORLD FAMOUS 3 · 0 0

Thought provoking question...

Maybe the government finds it easier to tackle with the AIDS malady than to take care of the age-long gangrene of poverty!

2007-02-18 16:09:08 · answer #8 · answered by D Bhowmick 2 · 0 0

Depends on what geographical area you're talking about. There are multiple reasons for the spread of HIV. Poverty is one of those. Lack of awareness is another. But even in poverty stricken areas where women are forced to sell themselves to survive or "pay off family debt," condoms are being used more often because the women and their "customers" are aware of how HIV is spread.
On the other hand HIV hasn't stopped spreading in rich countries (like the US). In well off countries, it started spreading because of sexual indulgence (multiple partners) and lack of awareness.

2007-02-18 16:07:50 · answer #9 · answered by orange 2 · 0 1

We would get a lot closer to eradicating horrible things like AIDs if there were less very ignorant people out there- like this poster. Where have you been to develop this opinion?

2007-02-18 16:29:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

We concentration on the rape and incest project through fact's a reality and it relatively is scares us to think of of roughly what would ensue if we have not got a call no undergo in strategies what the situations. via way of how, wiki says "thirteen,000 out of one million.31 million abortions in 2000 have been ensuing from rape or incest - that's one million% no longer .3" link below to the wiki source. in case you are able to desire to no longer grant your source, you are able to desire to replace your question. thirteen,000 is small mutually as located next to the whole yet each and each is lady attempting to handle a horribly worrying concern. a team of serial rapists have been those days caught in my city. The paper revealed what occurred in each and each case and it grew to grow to be into bone chilling. As a women persons it fairly makes you think of of. i'm no longer able to think of of what it may be decide to be pregnant from a rape and characteristic the government say you haven't any longer have been given any determination. restoration from a violent crime isn't uncomplicated sufficient yet this may be the rape that keeps on giving. For 9 months, no longer a 2d would conflict via way of which you does not think of of of the gang of guys raping and beating you. What in case you're married, would that marriage proceed to exist? And what if the raped women persons desperate she did no longer decide to grant it up for adoption and the rapist gets out of penal complicated and needs parental rights? useful it may be denied yet at what value? Dragging the teenager into courtroom docket? Making the ladies face her attacker lower back? Why do expert-lifers would desire to push that they gained't enable it even indoors the case of rape and incest? Why is the ladies's existence an ok reason on the lower back of a few yet no longer rape or incest? And why do optimal of guys care? that's relatively not some thing you will ever would desire to conflict via way of.

2016-10-15 23:48:01 · answer #11 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers