That is what Hillary is. Do not believe the hype, she is a liar and a thief who hasn't done a thing to help New York state or the country.
2007-02-18 14:54:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
first of all Obama wasn't a senator for the duration of the iraq vote. He does not have a clue what grow to be the ambience for the duration of those situations interior the senate. what style of intelligence checklist that the white domicile provided the US senators. Clinton replied this for the duration of the california debate the "If she knew then what she is acquainted with now" She mentioned it grow to be a tough determination. They have been short on the subject of the intelligence comments and have been given calls from the white domicile on the subject of the situtation in Iraq (on the subject of the wmd). She defined the ambience for the duration of those situations and the lower back and forth call from the white domicile and the UN. Edwards grow to be against invading Iraq yet look he voted to grant bush authority to invade iraq. There must be some thing on the intelligence checklist and that they've been assured that sadam posed a severe hazard. those Senators get briefings. the US senators who voted to grant bush authority did no longer make a mistake. It grow to be the Bush administration who made a mistake and people who ought to apologized through fact they did no longer thoroughly examine if the intelligence comments amassed have been precise. resembling a courtroom room. The bush administration is the prosecutor and the US senators are the jury. Bush admin. provided credible info to the senators. in line with info sadam grow to be a severe hazard so the senators voted to grant bush authority. Bush and cheney deceived a number of their team, too. Do you think of the jury ought to convey regret in the event that they convicted somebody in line with info and in an prolonged time became out the info grow to be misguided?
2016-10-15 23:43:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree with her and I hear her loud and clear. She feels she, like everyone else who believed it, was sold a bill of goods. The only thing she needs to apologize for is using bad judgment in believing her Commander in Chief and Vice President. She has already said she regrets her vote, and she regrets that we were all lied to. As one of the people who also believed her President, I feel much the same way. I bought it, most of us did. She, and everyone else who voted yea to give the President a blank check and uncontested authority, fully expected him to move with due caution and careful consideration. He did not, and he moved without a plan for the aftermath or an exit plan. I tend to sympathize more with those who trusted him than feel the need to berate them. It will be a long time before either House trusts the word of a President alone in determining that we need to go to war. Excepting a response to attack, every President, including Hillary, will have to do handsprings and stand on their head spitting nickels before the people or the House will take them at their word again. I know who to blame for this mess in Iraq, and it isn't Hillary Clinton, or the rest of those who trusted their President. It's the man in the Oval Office, the VP, and every "yes" man and woman in this Administration who still haven't wiped all the brown off of their noses.
2007-02-18 16:59:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Senator Hillary Clinton is one of the brightest on the USA political scene and she is a very Hard Worker in the Senate. She has done well for the people of New York State and she would make an excellent President.
2007-02-18 14:57:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by fatsausage 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
First, are you angry at yourself for believing Bush's words, that led everyone to believe Saddam was involved in 9/11, and that Iraq was a threat?
Second, have you even read the bill, that you tout as democrats voting for a war??!
to answer your question, no i am not angry at her for being misled by the bush admin, nor am i angry at her for voting yes on a bill that authorized use of force if found necessary by a responsible rational President. Unfortunately, Bush isn't one.
2007-02-18 16:05:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by qncyguy21 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Why? She was 1 of 29 Democrats in the Senate to approve the war. They also included Joseph Biden, Tom Harkin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, John Edwards, & even mister lecturer himself, Harry Reid. The House had enough Democrats join the vote to pass it 256-153. Once it is passed either live up to your word or have the guts to rescind it & bring them home. Do not endanger our troops & my son by cutting support & funding.
They are all hypocrites as they look for others to blame. Shame on them all.
2007-02-18 15:16:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Wolfpacker 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
nope i am not mad at her....... i would support her in anything because as far as i can tell she is the only one that seems to be speaking the truth about what is going on now in the goverment..... Bush has made the comment that he is going to leave the Troops over there for his sucessor to deal with.... thats what you should be mad about....... thats what everyone should be mad about...... how many more military soldiers are gonna have to have their lives taken for the president to be happy???? when will he bring the troops home? when there are none left??
i speak this way because my husband is in the army and is being deployed in May, yes i support him and all his fellow soldiers but i do not support Bush.....at all.......
when are the American People gonna vote in someone that will do anything that they ask other people to do?? Bush has asked the soldiers to go fight the war what has he done in that same aspect other than declare the war???? think about that when you are voting.......
2007-02-18 15:02:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by i_luv_my_army_man 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
Given the info at that time, she made the best choice she could.
That was a while ago, ya know?
She need not apologize for what she thought was right at the time
Hillary Rocks.
2007-02-18 14:57:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by BigTip$ 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
No she was kept in the dark and feed bs like the rest of congress and the un, it is the admistration that should be apologizing
2007-02-18 22:46:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by paulisfree2004 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
I can't be mad at Hilary for not having a backbone. Then I'd have to be mad at all the other Dems who didn't have the foresight to realize that when you go to war, you stay until the job is done. Silly libs....
2007-02-18 14:57:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋