2007-02-18 14:24:32 · 4 answers · asked by kristenval2000 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Apparently so the Government could bill us for our rights.
2007-02-18 14:28:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
During the debates on the adoption of the Constitution, its opponents repeatedly charged that the Constitution as drafted would open the way to tyranny by the central government. Fresh in their minds was the memory of the British violation of civil rights before and during the Revolution. They demanded a "bill of rights" that would spell out the immunities of individual citizens. Several state conventions in their formal ratification of the Constitution asked for such amendments; others ratified the Constitution with the understanding that the amendments would be offered.
On September 25, 1789, the First Congress of the United States therefore proposed to the state legislatures 12 amendments to the Constitution that met arguments most frequently advanced against it. The first two proposed amendments, which concerned the number of constituents for each Representative and the compensation of Congressmen, were not ratified. Articles 3 to 12, however, ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures, constitute the first 10 amendments of the Constitution, known as the Bill of Rights.
2007-02-18 14:30:39 · answer #2 · answered by landhermit 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
To appease the Anti-Federalists
2007-02-18 14:27:01 · answer #3 · answered by Hayden S. 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The constitution didn't provide sufficient safeguards for citizens.
2007-02-18 14:29:18 · answer #4 · answered by kscottmccormick 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋