2007-02-18 12:54:50 · 14 answers · asked by ? 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Quite frankly, my opinion right now is that it has started insanely early.
2007-02-18 12:59:11 · answer #1 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I think at this point it is alot of people putting out alot of polls and nothing more.
Unfortunatly, I doubt that this country is ready for a Black president or even a female president. There is sadly too much bigotry. I think it will come down to John Edwards picking a solid midwest running mate (Iowa maybe) against John McCane and Sam Brownback on the republican ticket. Brownback is not popular enough to win the Presidential primary, but he would make an excellent solidifer on the Republican base as a VP candidate. As for the democrats, if congress does not get it's act together soon, the majority could be slipping away and quick.
2007-02-18 13:02:16 · answer #2 · answered by phoenixbard2004 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It is a joke. We don't have a choice......we only have basically 2 candidates....who are from the 2 major parties......any other party really doesn't have a chance......not with the electorial college deciding the vote. If they would go back to the popular vote...then someone possibly less corrupt would actually have a chance to win. As it is now.....in my opinion.......we don't have really ANY chance of our vote counting....as long as the electorial college decides who the next president is. So why should we even bother to vote? Sorry for the rant.....but I believe it's justified.
2007-02-18 13:10:01 · answer #3 · answered by cajunrescuemedic 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's much too early to say who is going to win.Perhaps there should be a law that the campaign season should not start so soon before the election. By the time the election is near people are just sick of all the campaign ads!
2007-02-18 13:06:14 · answer #4 · answered by Big Time 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It's way way too early to be having to put up with this appalling foo.
The best I can imagine of any 'bright side' might be that it gives candidates more time to really rip their britches. Not what their opponents *say* about them, what they show of themselves.
Leadership is not that ill-mannered badmouthing we've been having to see, hear, read - leave that to streetcorner thugs.
I'll be looking for positions on issues, and please, some class.
2007-02-18 17:09:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
HIllary Clinton is the best candidate because she has the intelligence and experience to be President.
2007-02-18 13:42:46 · answer #6 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I can't decide between Rudy and McCain right now. I'm not going to vote Democrat, but if I had to choose one it would be Obama.
2007-02-18 13:04:05 · answer #7 · answered by jabb0404 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ron Paul is the only one worth voting for.
All the others are puppets of the banksters.
.
2007-02-18 13:02:48 · answer #8 · answered by s2scrm 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think if we are dealing with countries that have no respect for women, a female Pres. would have a hard time being an authority figure.
2007-02-18 13:02:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Its like reaching in a barrel of peanuts...not much difference right now.
2007-02-18 13:00:06 · answer #10 · answered by Laughing Man Copycat 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋