What is the point of the royal family?

Question

They take the tax payers money, they dont really do anything for society, they think they are better than everyone else and to top it all they dont even know what "real" life is like... so what is the point?

Answer 1

You're right. They don't really have a point.

I think they are really just there to hold up tradition and also, it helps England get tourists.

But, yeah....

I think it would be better if the royal family didn't take some tax money. They have enough money, don't you think?

Answer 2

The British royal family costs less than a pound per person to keep for a yr..... the Queen pays more back in taxes than what she gets paid for being the HRH...so the Brits actually are getting her services for free.
If there was no monarchy it would still cost the same, as the palaces etc...still need maintaining.
The point of the monarchy (Queen) is to protect the civilians from their own government....people saying she has no power are wrong, she has the power to bring down parliament and elect her on government tomorrow if she felt it necessary protect her subjects....the reason this has never been done proves that the Queen and government are doing their jobs, and the system works.
It's the family hanger ons that I disagree with, nobody should get paid an all the perks but the Queen and the next in line...of course that would be Charles.

Answer 3

Speaking as an American, I would say that we tend to look at the institution of the monarchy, rather than the individuals occupying the office, so to speak. In other words, at least for Americans, we have a rather short history and much of that connected to England and her history. Therefore, we appreciate the tradition and historical significance, knowing full well that those occupying it today are superfluous in the eyes of many of the British citizens. We also realize that there were not many monarchs, Royals, as you call them, in history that were individually admirable. Just enough, I suppose, to see England through some really tough times...

Answer 4

Honestly. In my opinion their is no point except..
Many have a sentimental connection to the Royal.
Yes they do take taxes but in return they bring billions of $ into the UK via Tourism, and souvenirs. It's a Firm as the Queen calls it and it runs as one. They are figure heads for pomp and ceremonial occasions. They are advocates for many Charities with their support they get recognition and donations from large companies as well as the individual. But realistically they could do that just by being Rich , popular People
not Royalty.That's my opinion. Ciao.

Answer 5

Nothing at all! Iv been to London many a time, including a visit to Buckingham Palace and never seen the Queen.
They jet around visiting to poor and ill but never really do anything about it. When has the Queen built a hospital, school, or given something worth while to the needy? Why not donate the cost of the flight to the cause?

Answer 6

There isn't one. In a constitutional monarchy, parliment holds all the power. It's just one of those traditions that makes the Brits feel better about being the geriatric player on the world stage.

Answer 7

i'm a republican simply by fact i do no longer think of human beings might desire to be head of state basically for the actuality they have been born right into a very prosperous kinfolk. i think of all human beings might desire to have equivalent opportunities to be triumphant. besides the undeniable fact that, in a Westminister parliamentary gadget, the place the top Minister/cabinet and the Commons are no longer separated, the place the administrative isn't held to account simply by fact of whips, i think of it relatively is basically about valuable to have an expert above politics making specific the politicians are held to account. it relatively is the only persuasive argument i will think of of, beside attrating travelers, it incredibly is susceptible because it presupposes that our palaces would not be appealing to travelers without the Royals -- I disagree with this argument as France is a republic with many palaces and attracts many travelers. i will additionally see the potential of advising the top Minister and government, yet it relatively is an extension of the persuasive argument above. i might say i might purely be happy to do away with the Crown if the Lords isn't elected like the Commons, the top Minister isn't elected via the Commons, and if he or she have been elected in a separate vote. i might ideally have top Minister who isn't a member of any political social gathering, and is purpose, a Lords which isn't political, and a Commons it incredibly is. i might think of it too risky to easily do away with the Crown and supply each and every of the means to political events. As one extra notice, i might choose for to confirm the Queen bumped off simply by fact the Church of england as we communicate and the Bishops out of the abode of Lords, as a single church of state is exclusionary to Catholics, Jews, Muslims, Sikhs, Hindus, Buddhists, Taoists, different Chriatians and atheists. We already have adequate branch in this u . s .; secularism might help to get far off from that.

Answer 8

They are like celebrities. They are supposed to like "embody" the culture of England.

They're just a leftover piece of a really old tradition that no one ever got rid of because it was patriotic, I guess.

Answer 9

You pay money to see a movie with an actor in it you possibly don't like. Same concept.

Answer 10

None whats so ever!
Except keeping tradition, history and national identity alive.
Although they are failing badly!