how can we prevent the president from ever declaring martial law?

Answer 1

We cant. All it would take is another terrorist attack. The only way would be to impeach him before it happens.

Answer 2

relies upon on the excuses behind it, is the country in a huge scale insurrection and upheaval? Then certain, at the same time as i'm in it is. Is it to declare the President a dictator? No. yet there are to many variables in a difficulty like that to furnish a concrete answer to at least some thing. Edit. look the persons revolting hostile to the wealthy will be basically reason for martial regulation, it would really be equivalent to all communist and French revolutions obtainable. basically because they are wealthy would not advise that they are evil. dissimilar small organization vendors and persons that performed the market are the wealthy, that is basically idiots like the occupy people and favourite media that paints them as undesirable people. And believe me, we've it solid in the U. S.. can we want to choose more beneficial advantageous people into workplace? quite, yet it is the interest of each and every citizen to party. And choose or write in the solid people. also I take care of that we want more beneficial previous enlisted to run for workplace, they might ought to record debates in order that that they could edit out the troublesome language, which may get people attracted to politics, and they might easily attempt to regulate issues and make issues useful.

Answer 3

He has no reason to under the Constitution, but then he has the "Military Commissions Act of 2006" where he can suspend habeas corpus, but the Act itself is UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

Lincoln tried the same thing!

Article 1, Section 9 states, "The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it." Habeas corpus is a concept of law, in which a person may not be held by the government without a valid reason for being held. A writ of habeas corpus can be issued by a court upon a government agency (such as a police force or the military). Such a writ compels the agency to produce the individual to the court, and to convince the court that the person is being reasonably held. The suspension of habeas corpus allows an agency to hold a person without a charge. Suspension of habeas corpus is often equated with martial law.

Because of this connection of the two concepts, it is often argued that only Congress can declare martial law, because Congress alone is granted the power to suspend the writ. The President, however, is commander-in-chief of the military, and it has been argued that the President can take it upon himself to declare martial law. In these times, Congress may decide not to act, effectively accepting martial law by failing to stop it; Congress may agree to the declaration, putting the official stamp of approval on the declaration; or it can reject the President's imposition of martial law, which could set up a power struggle between the Congress and the Executive that only the Judiciary would be able to resolve.

In the United States, there is precedent for martial law. Several times in the course of our history, martial law of varying degrees has been declared. The most obvious and often-cited example was when President Lincoln declared martial law during the Civil War. This instance provides us with most of the rules for martial law that we would use today, should the need arise.

ex parte Milligan

On September 15, 1863, Lincoln imposed Congressionally-authorized martial law. The authorizing act allowed the President to suspend habeas corpus throughout the entire United States. Lincoln imposed the suspension on "prisoners of war, spies, or aiders and abettors of the enemy," as well as on other classes of people, such as draft dodgers. The President's proclamation was challenged in ex parte Milligan (71 US 2 [1866]). The Supreme Court ruled that Lincoln's imposition of martial law (by way of suspension of habeas corpus) was unconstitutional.

Answer 4

He can declare ML and close down the Supreme Court. They are needed for Congress to overturn him. He has been replacing generals with puppets but the bottom line is without our troops backing him he has no power to uphold ML. Currently 15% of our troops back him.

Answer 5

Don't provide him with an excuse, such as what happened in Arizona recently. Public violence, pointing guns at people, are the things that can provoke Martial Law. Protesting is ok, guns and explosives are not.

Answer 6

Can't do that, but WISH ! he has too much protection (spiritual) . But I definately believe that will happen. Been telling people for a while he will not get out of THIS office. The only way is for him to create a WAR situation that he has to shut down the U.S. ! Wellllll, I believe he is calling it NATIONAL SECURITY ?! Go figure .....

Answer 7

Don't worry it won't happen because the military would have to go along with it for it to be effective so there would have to be a pretty darn good reason.

Answer 8

prosecute him treasonous *** .. he is legally NOT the President . We have NOT had a legal President since 2008 .. PUT him in prison where he & Hillary & soros belong

Answer 9

Get the peaceniks to stop their crybaby coe\wardly whining.........also don't let the Bad Guys get in country...if 011 happens again there would be good reason for it...As long as we are achieving Victory and the Peceniks are quiet, Marttial law will never be needed

Answer 10

Um, he would have to have a damned good reason to do that. And as long as the Liberals don't take away our right to bare Arms. Good Luck.