Whats the difference between to democrats of Today and the ones of the US civil War?

Question

They are still the party of losing is the best policy.

Answer 1

I don't understand you're point. But I think you will find the information at this website interesting. It will probably help you to understand why YOU think the way you do:

http://piv.pivpiv.dk/

Answer 2

Hironymus is wrong as usual.The Republicans were the liberal left during the civil war.The Democrats were the conservatives.And Harpman probably doesn't realize is that Democrats started the war.What the heck do you think the Confederates were?
His implied accusation of Democrats as Pacifists is way off target.

And as for the Democrats being unable to wage war,remember those two world wars,when America actually saved the world?The administration in both were Democratic.

The difference between Republican and Democrats waging war is that Democratic presidents tend to fight when its necessary and just.Republicans tend to fight for profit.They've been doing that since the Spanish-American war.

Answer 3

The Democrats of the Civil War were Pro-Slavery.

Answer 4

No real difference.They were against Lincoln, the north and the War..They were Pro Secession, Pro Slavery....Very similar to the Libs of 2007. Good thing the Republicans were in control

Answer 5

Liberals during the civil war were against Lincoln. Nothing has changed. They still do not understand that some dictators have to be stomped on- hard.

Answer 6

The tables are turned,now conservatives have instigated every world war up to date. Liberals are the ones liberating their countries.

Answer 7

This is a really silly question, and I have already answered it here once. Short answer:
- Woodrow Wilson
-FDR
-LBJ
Party of losers and pacifists? I think not.