Look, we wouldn't be at the edge of world war three if bush didn't stick his nose in every ones business. He practically controls the middle east and killed so many innocent there. And when someone defends, well their terrorists. If he just left everyone alone and let them live their life and vote for the government they want then we wouldn't be on the brink of the third world war. So every country should mind his own business.
2007-02-18 10:47:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by A broken puzzle 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
Not as of today. But all of this turmoil is leading up to, some
people say world war 111, but it is truly known as the Battle of
Armageddon. This battle is beyond human comprehension.
Joel: 3:2 & Revelation: 16: 13-14, 16. There will be Nuclear blast, sores on your body that will not heal & no way to die even if you tried. Many Anti-christ will appear, some will fall for his deciet, why? Because he will have demonic power. Unless you know God personally, you will not know the difference between the Anti-christ and the Son Of God! The skies will be darkened over 1/3 of the earth, The water will become bitter. The grass &the trees will burn-up. A third of the sea will turn to blood. And this is just the beginning! Revelation: 8. At this time all Saints will be in Heaven. This battle is for those who do not know the Lord and to punish all of the evil & the wickendess. There will be a few people saved during this time of horror, but not many.
2007-02-18 10:41:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by NJ 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
you make an interesting point, but i believe to be at "world war 3" there would have to be conflict between 2 modern forces (ie russia vs US) (france vs england), or more of a possibility is russia and china vs the US. (although not very possibly).
we are a long way off those things and no country really wants to spend, or even has enough resources (except the US, and china to a much smaller extent) to really fight a war. im not sure anyone in the US wants to fight any sort of enemy, unless there is another 9/11 caliber attack. I go to school in boston and the anti war feelings here are very strong.
As a canadian i would say that canada is far from fighting any kind of war. (unless they keep moving hockey teams to the southern US, where no one ever likes hockey)
2007-02-18 10:09:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mike 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is a war on terrorism so that means a never ending war. War cannot be won when it doesn't have a enemy to fight. Terrorism will not fight on the front lines it retaliates from the dark corners. Therefore it could be considered as a ww. But it will never come to a close. Remember the roman empire from history or the Mongolian empire from history. When one power seems to be unbeatable and throws its power and demands onto others sooner or later they will revolt and good triumphs.We are in the American Empire now and the rest of the world dislike our direction and actions.
Iran if attacked I fear will bring us into the darkest times. Yes russia has interest as does China they both received almost all their fuel from Iran.I don't think they will let their precious fuel supply be blown up or taken by us.
Listen to how we are fed bits and pieces of stories to manage to make our version more believable. Example is teh interview with the pres of Iran. Cbs 60 minutes only show very small portion of the overall interview which made him look as bad as they could but when you see the whole interview you find he has very good points that need to be listened to carefully, without prejudice.
2007-02-18 10:19:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by stephenmwells 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
The Islamists are positioning their people all over the world for an all-out assault on infidels. It might be subtle in some areas now, but once the Islamic population exceeds a certain percentage (usually around 25%), they will demand an Islamic State, violently if necessary.
2007-02-18 10:30:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
this could be international conflict IV, the third being the chilly conflict and all of the wars, like Korea, Viet Nam, communist take overs and issues like that. on a similar time as China, Cuba, Viet Nam and N. Korea are all nevertheless Communist, the Soviet bloc, inclusive of Russia at the instant are in one way or yet another democracies. The conflict on Terror could be WW IV. it could have began on Sept. 11, yet extra possibly began after the six day conflict of Israel vs. the Arabs, simply by fact it replaced into after that the Palestinian problem have been given a large type of interest. yet extra possibly the conflict on terrorism is extra moderen regardless of issues like the Iran Hostage disaster, and assorted different issues in the eighty's and ninety's. yet i would not worry too lots approximately North Korea or China. i ought to be incorrect, yet North Korea, who i replaced into extra in contact approximately 3 or 4 years in the past, possibly isn't a real danger. And China, on a similar time as shall we've problems with them, from what I understand the problem have been fishing boats, no longer conflict ships.
2016-10-02 08:45:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by koffler 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, world war 4 perhaps.
World war 3 must be won before the world can take on Islam.
.
2007-02-18 10:32:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by s2scrm 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know what defines a 'world war' exactly, but the conditions sure seem tumultous. It is scary. I hope the countries control thier urges, keep their egos in check, and make peaceful non-violent mature decisions before things go out of control. I am praying. Maybe we all need to pray together.
2007-02-18 10:13:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, in the last world war 100's of thousands of soldiers lost their lives a year, and this so called war hasnt produced those type of numbers in 5 years, not even close, only about 800 american soldiers are dying a year, no world war, besides the power house countries arent facing each other
2007-02-18 10:03:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are right, but we are in an early stage of the conflict. It will probably be at least 10 years before the war is full blown. (I could be wrong.)
Have you heard about Chinese New Year? It's the Year of the Pig. But the Chinese government is limiting the use of images of pigs for the New Year Celebration, to avoid offending Muslims. Weird?
And it is apparently not the Chinese Muslim minority they are trying to placate. The Chinese Muslims have not expressed concern about pig images. So which Muslims are they trying to please?
2007-02-18 10:09:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by The First Dragon 7
·
2⤊
0⤋