Would the outcome of WW1 and WW2 be appreciably different, had Italy staid with the Central powers/Axis?

Question

Oh - and why not? There were significant battles between Austria and Italy, at least in WW1.

Answer 1

In WW I Italy fought beside the Allies, participating decidedly in the defeat of the Austro Hungarian empire.

In WW II Italy fought beside the Axis . Germany Japan, Bulgaria, Hungary, Finland and others. But its participation was very poor.

All of Italy´s interventions were a disaster in Greece, Africa.
More than once Germany had to urgently help its partner so disaster would not befall Italy.
Italy Finally surrendered in 1943.

Answer 2

I don't believe so. In World War I, the Austrians seemed to be pushing back the Italians on that front until help from other Allies arrived. In World War II, Italy joined the Allies only after the Allies pushed the Italians out of North Africa and the Italians deposed Mussolini. The biggest difference, in my opinion, would be no "Big Four" at Versailles, as the fourth was the Italian prime minister, Vittorio Orlando.

Answer 3

the two have been incredibly ill. WWI ought to have been somewhat worse because of the fact it became right into a conflict of three Emperors who could have conventional , if that they had had any brains, that they've been on their final legs. WWII became into approximately revenge, and how a 2-bit corporal ought to take over the international (and only approximately did). that is hard to declare which conflict took greater lives - a super sort of human beings died from starvation in the 1st dirt-up, yet then their have been extremely some people who have been intentionally murdered in the 2d bypass-around. for my section, i think of that's a toss-up. each time a individual dies because of the selections made by ability of yet another guy or woman - that is f***ed up.

Answer 4

no