I'm so glad you asked that! I have always wondered about Bungle in Rainbow (UK kids programme), he struts around starkers all day long then puts pyjamas on to go to bed!
2007-02-18 08:55:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
custom, i assume. See, bugs Bunny and a large type of alternative early "bushy animal" sorts of comic strip characters have been initially shown in _movie theaters_ in the previous television replaced right into a element. So there replaced right into a presumption that the character and cloth replaced into made for _all audiences_, no longer purely toddlers. this is significant to maintain this in innovations simply by fact properly, bushy animals are bushy. Technically something with a coat of fur isn't nude in line with se as long as _bits_ are not showing. yet, on a similar time, once you _include_ adults on your aim audience you _risk_ it that some human beings will infer the worst and maximum irrelevant issues if _anything_ seems questionable. simply by fact heavily? america is packed to the gills with uptight killjoys and flat-out _idiots_ all around. you already know the type--human beings whose worldview is so fragile and slender that they panic and _rage out_ over the theory that a teenage boy might, working example, like a properly-made comic strip for his youngster sister. that type. So yeah, animators might desire to innovations the prudes, fundies and psychos. and because nipples etc get annoying at times whilst moist and chilly, properly, particularly than cope with that throughout the time of any respect, they simply have the characters positioned on towels and trunks to "cover issues" that weren't there in the artwork type in the 1st place just to _make damned sure_. and additionally each and every thing is as saggy and plaid (or in any different case grotesque) as could be so no one makes any "saucy" inferences. Ugh. heavily. i ought to confirm this being a difficulty in the Nineteen Thirties and Nineteen Forties whilst bugs Bunny made his debut in movie theaters, yet relatively now? a similar theory and worse holds actual in this ruined twenty first century. Now characters won't be in a position to be clumsy or much less-astonishing-than-properly-known the two. bypass discern.
2016-10-02 08:40:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by gerking 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Great point lol. Same with donald duck, when he doesnt wear pants but comes out of the shower with a towel around his waist. ;-)
2007-02-18 08:56:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He's Bugs Bunny, he doesn't need to explain himself!
2007-02-18 08:53:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
lol yup yup yup. and Donald Duck, he never wears pants but when he comes out of the shower he has the towel around his waste
2007-02-18 08:54:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Cuz he doesn't want any fishies to swim up his bunny bum.
2007-02-18 08:56:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Cuppycake♥ 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
OMG, that's just too funny, but oh so true. I can't grasp the concept of getting dressed to go swimming, or to bed. I love it NUDE. ~~~~~~~~``
2007-02-18 08:55:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe he gets turned on by watersports
2007-02-18 11:24:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
he has a bizaar phobia of getting his private bunny parts wet. its the only answer
2007-02-18 08:53:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
you know what wet bunny hair does !
2007-02-18 12:49:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋