2007-02-18 08:39:16 · 19 answers · asked by steve738494 3 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
No, what in fact happened was this - God dropped 300 tons of A4 copier paper from heaven which landed on 2 planes which then flew off course and hit the twin towers. This was in fact an extreme advertising campaign orchestrated by a little known terrorist organisation based in Coalville called m2G.
2007-02-19 05:59:39 · answer #1 · answered by mistral23 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
According to a documentary I watched quite recently on this, yes he did. He had in fact known about the plot for several months before but chose not to do anything until it was too late. Instead of trying to reason with the country or putting things in to place to protect innocent lives, he chose to allow it to happen - and lets face it, he only did this so he could go to war to prove a point.. that he's bigger and better than his dad and can take on the world if he wants to.
I dont think its the rest of the world we should be afraid of..Mr Bush is probably the biggest terrorist going yet. He should leave other countries alone and stop dragging us Brits into it too. He's definately pushing for a world war 3!
2007-02-19 04:38:09 · answer #2 · answered by charlotte s 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It had been a long time in planning in the Pentagon and Cheney, Bush was the perfect President to "Act on Plan" as he is totally for all corrupt plans for profit and power and has never connected or given a damn about or what the American people think/do..nor the miseries visited upon them...Mary
2007-02-18 16:53:35 · answer #3 · answered by mary57whalen 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The question itself leaves a bad taste. I am not an American. I also fear what Bush is capable of at this time, but it is appalling that some actually think he would be invoved in such an act perpetrated on his homeland. I do not believe it.
2007-02-18 17:15:28 · answer #4 · answered by JOHN D 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That is like asking if FDR knew about Pearl Harbor.
The event happened to fit into their plans, and so one could make an argument about facilitation.
But, no one will ever know the answer.
2007-02-18 16:49:54 · answer #5 · answered by reclaimer456 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've got a feeling he did, purely so he had a reason to invade the middle east, he could only do that by propagating mass fear, nasty man, Bush, so is Tony Blair, both very,very nasty men!
2007-02-19 05:38:07 · answer #6 · answered by Mr Sarcastic 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think he had 'something to do' with it per se, rather criminal elements within his own administration did.
Bush is clearly too dumb to pull something so elaborate off himself. However, I DO believe he knew exactly what was going on at the time.
Take a look at this, and see what you think:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4j9Bj8JJwco
2007-02-19 08:20:27 · answer #7 · answered by Buck Flair 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would doubt it - the event undermined the Bush administration.
2007-02-18 16:47:43 · answer #8 · answered by pstzqueen 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You know Yanswers has a feature that will show you whether or not the same question has been asked before. But if I had to answer, I think Reclaimer has it about right.
2007-02-18 16:44:49 · answer #9 · answered by GeauxJoe 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Its a good story I think something dodgey happened but I dont think Bush would be clever enough to plan it.
2007-02-18 20:05:39 · answer #10 · answered by norfolk'n good 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋