Why do neo-cons want to invade Iran when it's the Saudis who are arming and financing most of the insurgents

Question

A military report released shows that only 8% of attacks against our troops are Iran related.

However 25% of coalition casualties are linked to the Sunni controlled Saudi govornment.

So why not attack Saudi Arabia? They are the one's most responsible for the carnage in Iraq.

Or does Bush want to attack Iran because his family is best friends with the Saudi family (same family that has funded terrorism including Al-Qaeda for decades) ?

Does Bush and Cheney stand to make more money by invading Iran (see Halliburton and the Carlyle Group)? Does Iran have more oil?

Or is it because Bush has investments with the Bin Laden family? I mean if it's the sunni Saudi's who are funding most of this crap, then why invade Iran?

Sounds like Conservatives doesn't it? Bin Laden attacks us so let's invade Iraq. Saudi Arabia is funding the insurgents so lets hit Iran.

I think I remember why conservatives lost the elections, and why red states are now blue.

Answer 1

Because Bush and the Saud's have a long relationship. Just like Bush's grandfather worked for the Nazis.

Besides, you're using facts and we all know that neo-cons don't like those.

Answer 2

Your facts are a little off. It is the Shiites who are creating the new problems. The Sunnis you talk of are the remains of Saddam's old guard. There is a struggle in Iraq with the old enemy and an emerging Shiite threat.
It is a mess beyond belief. Thank you Mr. Bush.

Answer 3

That just proves that we aren't over there for oil. If we were, we WOULD HAVE attacked saudi araba. They produce much more oil than iraq

Answer 4

one word------OIL