It would do a lot of good to U.S.A as well as to the other countries of the world ,if U.S.A changes its' policy with a major departure to adopt " non-interference in the policies of other countries" and "allowing UNO to function with fulll freedom" to discharge its' obligations to the service of humanity.
In the past ,Nehru era, India was heading the non-aligned movement with "priciples of Panch sheel" meanining "five cordinal principles for the countries to adopt for the betterment of humanity.
India, not so strong a nation ,under the first Prime Minister Nehru,immediately after independance , was heading the best policy of non-aligned movement and propagation of Panch Sheel ,for the welfare of theworld community.
If U.S.A, being the politically,militarily and technologically the strongest nation in the world today,can sincerely organise and take up the leadership of the non-aligned movement ,the world will advance and prposper in all spheres of activities ,and U.S.A. will be doing a lot of service to the humanity at large. And ,their fight against terrorism,poverty,disease etc will find meaningful expressions with solutions for all maladies afflicting the human society.
2007-02-18 07:12:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by NQS 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
the single element it incredibly is maximum sorely lacking in US distant places coverage is comprehend. relatively, all that Europeans, Muslims, chinese language, Russians, and different choose for is to be dealt with with comprehend. Ignoring lawsuits and proposals, insulting international leaders, etc. - it relatively is not any way for a ultimate u . s . to act. i think of that even Iraq might have been supported via the international if the US did no longer run roughshod over the UN and accepted protocol.
2016-10-02 08:34:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Life lives on opposites and US is one of that opposites. Its for their sake we the developing nations strive to keep going ahead. US has to stop manufacturing arms and its International trade. Its surplus stocks and every R&D that is carried out for more sophastication in weaponary that need to create rivalary, battlefields and supermacy on one-another!
2007-02-18 23:51:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by kauly 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would ask them to do away with the Council on Foreign Relations.
2007-02-18 06:58:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i always wondered while the vis rules of US are so stringent, u r denied unduly, etc work so hard, etc....u will be denied a visa saying that u look to be a potential immigrant to USA so, we cannot issue visa (tourist, J1 etc) to you. But on the other side, u will find families queueing up to get the immigrant visa....
2007-02-19 17:06:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Stop trying to be the "Power Behind the Throne". It keeps getting us in trouble with every person the U.S. sets up in power and that person turns around and bites the hand that feeds him.
2007-02-18 07:05:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Get them to stay out of other peoples' business, the USA has enough problems of it's own.
2007-02-18 07:06:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by whyme? 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Dump Israel and solve the roots of our problems in the middle east
2007-02-18 07:11:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Keep our nose to ourselves unless someone really needed help. and the Other Countries step up 1st before we did.
2007-02-18 07:01:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by spiritwalker 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
No more Foreign lobbyist, the Israeli lobby.
2007-02-18 06:52:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋