I keep expecting to read about it any day now.
What's going on?
2007-02-18 06:46:44 · 13 answers · asked by Handsome Boy Modeling School 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Meathook - thank you. so, just a few more years and we'll find them?
Great.
It'll be nice to have that out of the way.
2007-02-18 06:53:08 · update #1
With all the really great issues out there that can be debated to such great benefit, I am soooooo happy that a certain group of our society is STILL chanting, WMD, WMD, WMD!
Why don't you take a break and find your last cell of integrity and ADMIT it isn't about WMD, it isn't about Islamic Fascist, it isn't about the thousands that died in the towers, it isn't about ANYTHING except that you HATE BUSH. Everything you think and everything you do is centered around that one thing.
As if all the problems in America and the world today are there and caused by Bush. Do you know just how stupid that makes you sound? You, who take such pride in your intellectual superiorty complex? Get a grip, do some honest research and look at the most blatant of realities and then TRY, really TRY to come to a conslusion about ANYTHING that isn't about Bush.
Geesh, you guys are beginning to really get on my last nerve!!
2007-02-18 08:32:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
It depends on what your definition of "MASS destruction" is. There were sarin gas canisters found with the capacity to kill 10's of thousands, but that wasn't a "stockpile" so no credit was given.
Our military did dig up military fighter planes that Saddam had buried in the desert. Kinda not too far off to think that any evidence of something the size of a suitcase (chemical and bio weapons) could have been buried as well.
2007-02-18 06:53:25 · answer #2 · answered by SouthernGrits 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Never..Its not because they never existed, as only a fool would say they didn't..but there is the possibilities Iraq complied with UN resolutions ,something even the CIA would say is not out of the question but the Bush administration and his supporters can not admit for obvious reasons !
2007-02-18 07:04:28 · answer #3 · answered by dadacoolone 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They did, genius....or didn't you hear about the 600 TONS of chemical weapons our troops found?
Or did you not know that chemical weapons are considered WMDs? I know the liberal sheeple have been brainwashed by the news media into believing that the term "WMD" applies only to nuclear weapons when in actuality the term is used to describe nuclear, chemical, and biological agents as well.
You're not one of those brainwashed sheeple, are you?
2007-02-18 07:17:38 · answer #4 · answered by Blunt But True 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It won't take long...we just have to ask Master Shrub to see a proctologist and bend over. The doc will have a pretty good light to shine on the situation and can report back to us.
2007-02-18 06:58:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They have it. The smoking gun. The evidence. The potential weapon of mass destruction they have been looking for as their pretext of invading Iraq. There's just one problem - it's in North Korea.
2007-02-18 06:52:53 · answer #6 · answered by Jack 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They will never be found unless we keep going in ot Iran or Syria. You guys that keep stuck on this one thing really have lot any credibility with thinking people everywhere.
2007-02-18 06:51:13 · answer #7 · answered by meathookcook 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Haven't you heard? Our reasons for invading turned out to be a fluke. Now we're there fighting a battle that can't physically be won.
2007-02-18 06:50:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
didn't you know they took that information of a student who was doing a subject for his exams a few years ago,,
2007-02-18 06:52:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
as soon as we get the ratpublican out of office and get in a dummycrat, then we as sheeple will demand it! how do ya like me now?
2007-02-18 06:52:17 · answer #10 · answered by Billie R 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋