English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-18 06:16:41 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

16 answers

He's the Democrat version of Dan Quayle.

2007-02-18 06:32:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He has so far proven to be honest in admitting his past transgressions. Every politician trys to invoke the sense of a life from ground up without letting on that they too face some of the ills that many people have. I have used drugs, but don't any longer. I admire that Senator Obama has admitted to his past use of drugs and for that I admire because many other politicians want to run from that news thinking it would kill their campaign. I admire his story he gave in his announcement speech. Graduted from college and moved to Chicago to assist in forming an Action Group for many poor churches only to see some obstacles. That was an enlightenment to him so he chose to further himself with a degree in law. His record doesn't reflect that of the typre of lawyer many loathe, it is one of activism. I have always been Republican on the National Political scene, but I will research him more and may just support him.

2007-02-18 14:27:20 · answer #2 · answered by albert_noodles 3 · 1 0

I would think it would be great if we had an intelligent man like Obama as the President of the U.S. However, I do believe that maybe he needs a bit more legislative experience before becoming president. However, if he ran, I would support him 100%. It'd be great to see a fresh face, for a change.

2007-02-18 14:23:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Would make an interesting president. Much better speaker than we have had in the presidential elections for a long time.

progressive liberal side of moderate. Not that bad of a choice.

2007-02-19 18:26:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Even though I'm a die-hard Conservative, I think that Obama would probably make a good president. He's intelligent and a great speaker.

2007-02-18 14:20:55 · answer #5 · answered by NoLeftTurn 2 · 2 0

a very intelligent man intuned with the people. where he lacks experience he makes up in education and communication. he definitely is not hard on the eyes.

2007-02-18 15:23:45 · answer #6 · answered by toyloy27 3 · 0 0

Who????
I don't try to at all
who cares about a far left liberal socialist surrender monkey

2007-02-18 14:41:13 · answer #7 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

I think he has more balls than most congressmen. He has more ideas than most as well. He deserves the nomination more than Hillary.

2007-02-18 14:19:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

He oughtta be the next president.

2007-02-18 14:19:31 · answer #9 · answered by psyduck702 4 · 2 0

next president

2007-02-18 14:40:01 · answer #10 · answered by Paul 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers