English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12,000 troops in Afganistan......150,000+ in Iraq.

Should the USA concentrate on catching Bin Laden and Al Queda...the people that attcked the USA?

2007-02-18 05:45:19 · 25 answers · asked by Villain 6 in Politics & Government Politics

25 answers

when Bush is out of office

2007-02-18 05:47:35 · answer #1 · answered by Dr Universe 7 · 3 0

What, catch Bin Laden? Then the good folks of the USA will think we are finished with our task of fighting terrorism and demand that our troops come home.....Dubya needs Bin Laden on the run, he can continue to use him as an excuse why we should continue taking over middle eastern countries.....

If I was a betting man, I'd say the USA will be in Iran within the next 12 months......our reason? Looking for nukes and Bin Laden.....

2007-02-18 05:49:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

They should, but there is no oil in Afganistan. Bush & Co. are using 9/11 as an excuse to go after the oil in Iraq.

2007-02-18 05:49:20 · answer #3 · answered by Ti 7 · 2 0

I think the reason we aren't is that the real "war on terror" has shifted to Iraq. We must succeed there.

We will catch Osama eventually, but think of it this way: It took 6 months to capture Saddam, and he was hiding in a Baghdad suburb. Osama is somewhere in the hills of Afghanistan... A little bit rougher terrain.

Between our reward and worldwide attention, I assure you, he will either be caught, or die in a cave.

2007-02-18 06:00:39 · answer #4 · answered by WJ 7 · 1 0

The US should be more worried about catching Bush, he's attacking the whole world. Compared to Bush, Bin Laden is like a pipsqueak church mouse with a pea shooter.

2007-02-18 05:49:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

lol barry doesn;t choose for to seize his kinfolk. and as for Bush you predicted him individually to bypass searching for osama? very astonishing. barry couldn;t run up the moutains too a great way being a smoker. yet howdy why don;t you volunteer considering which you anticipate somebody to try this. be brave. volunteer.and that i.m specific via your communicate you already know precisely the place that cave is. wow. very astonishing

2016-10-02 08:31:57 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Yes we should no one is protesting the war to get him, he could be dead already, but I think that the MIlitary Industrial Comples doesnt want him caught as hes good for business

2007-02-20 22:04:18 · answer #7 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 0 0

In 2008 or when Bush is not working in the office anymore.

2007-02-18 05:48:41 · answer #8 · answered by simpson3303 3 · 2 0

If they did.....

Bin Laden might even be at the Bush ranch right now smoking with Alberto and Neil

2007-02-18 05:49:39 · answer #9 · answered by Taco . 1 · 5 1

They might make another half a**ed effort after the next big terrorist attack in the U.S.A gives them an excuse for invading another soveriegn nation for a contrived reason.
To the Neo Cons 911 was a gift from god.
3,000 dead means nothing to them
3,000.000 dead means nothing to them.
30,000,00 dead means nothing to them.

2007-02-18 05:54:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

they cut the funding for the Hunt for Bin Ladin very quietly; likely the day the Saudi's told Bush that he was going home and if we tried to abduct him they would cut us off from oil.

2007-02-18 05:48:56 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers