In a period of National Security No FLY policy ... ONLY the Bin Ladens were able to fly out of the USA.
A right and Priviledge denied to every living American... So please tell me, why should I believe in the bogieman..?
surely Osama is more important than the Republicans will admit.
2007-02-18
05:33:22
·
20 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Raoul Duke, Don't worry, I am used to the vacuous, idiotic insults, primarily from that self proclaimed Bush apologist, Jesi. Devoid of any cogent argument they question your nationality. I am used to it. Note the regurgitation of the lie about OSB disowning his family.. Like they know this for a fact. CONS never provide an answer just insults.
2007-02-18
06:04:06 ·
update #1
When Bush, Sr. used to visit Saudi Arabia, he stayed at the home of Bin-Laden’s father (admittedly is it not quite the same when someone has 30 or 40 children compared to 2 or 3).
Saudi Prince Bandar was informed about our plans to invade Iraq before Colin Powell (then Secretary of State).
On 9/11, most of those on the planes were Saudi nationals.
Most of the current support for Iraqi insurgents comes from Saudi Arabia (not Iran or Syria).
Good question. Why does Saudi Arabia always get a pass?
--------------------------------------
BADAZZ ---
If what you say is true, then how do you explain Bin-laden making that video appearance to help Bush in the 2004 presidential campaign?
Why is it that Bush has made terrorist organizations larger, more powerful, and more popular than ever – while simultaneously weakening America’s military and economy, and restricting the rights and liberties of America’s citizens?
Why has Bush failed in Afghanistan and Iraq – turning the latter into a terrorist state where before there were no terrorists at all?
2007-02-18 05:47:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Several members of the Bush family are investors in the Carlyle Group, a defense contractor and investment fund with numerous interests in the Middle East, run by former Reagan administration Secretary of Defense Frank Carlucci.[3] The media noted that former President George H. W. Bush attended an investment meeting at the Washington, D.C. Ritz-Carlton hotel on September 10, 2001 and in particular a meeting with Shafiq bin Laden, representing joint interests of the Saudi Binladin Group and Carlyle.[4] (Bush did not attend the morning of September 11, although it has been alleged that the meeting took place during the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Former Secretary of State James Baker was present, along with Carlucci.[4]) The Carlyle and Binladin groups mutually severed their business relationship on October 26, 2001.[4] wikipedia your question: because hes part of the problem Pink
2016-05-24 02:37:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Very good question. Osama bin Laden was, and I think still is, in the employ of the CIA. He led the Afghan rebels in the Soviet invasion in the early 80's. The whole 911 thing was orchestrated by the US Government to give the American people somebody to hate since the Soviets are no more. Shrubby needed an enemy to invade. He was destined by the Skull & Bones to be a war President. He loves the idea of being a war President. Don't be surprised if he goes into Iran. That would be a huge mistake. They can't even take care of things in Iraq. Iran is bigger and stronger than Iraq.
2007-02-18 05:54:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jack O'Lantern 3
·
8⤊
0⤋
There have been many conflicts of interest in this administration. I think I'd rather be concerned about my president boinking his secretary than asking me to support a war that doesn't help my country, helping his sector of business reap record profits while the rest of the country gets screwed, dividing the country horribly over science and religion, encouraging hate to flourish in and out of the country, not taking responsibility for commanding the country in the case of a massive natural disaster, and not killing the SOB that was responsible for 9-11 when there has damn well been plenty of opportunity.
2007-02-18 06:11:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Cheshire Cat 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
The bin Laden family was offered diplomatic immunity, for lack of better words, folllowing 9/11, because it was determined these people had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks, and for their own personal safety, it was best to get them out of the US.
This is the same courtesy the US offered the Japanese diplomats in Washington DC, following the attack on Pearl Harbor!
2007-02-18 05:44:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by briang731/ bvincent 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Why would a "Humanist" hate anyone? Your hatred for Bush doesn't support your self proclaimed humanism.
Bsides, since you are not an American why do you have such an overwhelming obsession with Bush? You should believe that Osama Bin laden is a terrorist, if you live in any western country you would know that Al-Qaeda is real.
2007-02-18 05:44:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Well because the question being based on slander and not backed up with facts just shows where the real hate comes from.
2007-02-18 09:12:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Huminist that is because he was responsable for many deaths and the Bush family seem to over look that fact and instead cloud the issue with a war that is proving to be futile.
2007-02-18 05:39:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Let's see, just HOW dumb are you? First off, the family had disowned Osama years prior to this, and second. The no fly policy was lifted before they left...
2007-02-18 05:43:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Cookie Monster 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Did you notice, that Barack Obama and Osama have never been seen in public at the same time. I don't think , I know they are one
and the same.
2007-02-18 05:44:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋