Senator Kerry, was wishy-washy on things. President Bush, stuck to his ideals. Ans has stayed with those same views.
2007-02-18 05:35:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Goggles 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
Because Kerry is a liar and a flip-flopper. In October of 2003, during the televised debate, Kerry said that Bush was going to start the draft again, it never happened. He voted for the war, then voted against it. He would go to Detroit to speak to the UAWU, give them a big pep talk on how they would sell SUV's if he is elected, then a day later go speak at a environmental event, saying if he is elected, they would go more to hybrid cars. This is just a small example of why Kerry was a bad nominee for the democrat party.
2007-02-18 13:34:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by Johnny Conservative 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
Because 51% of those who voted thought that Bush was a better choice. It's the 48% who voted for Kerry that I wonder about.
2007-02-18 13:40:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
I can't say voting for Bush was my best decision, but when faced with that SCUM-BAG Kerry, I'd cast my vote for Bush ten times over. Here's why:
You may not remember, or were too young, but there was a little situation in South east Asia we (the United States) got involved in. Right or wrongly, we were in it. Mr. Kerry felt that his enlistment would further his political ambitions so he joined up to supposedly serve his country.
Oh, and did he serve.
He got into a little hot action on a swift boat, as soon as he could, he bailed out. In doing so he convinced his superior officers that he was wounded and should get not one, but three Purple Hearts.
When he got state side and out of the military, he and a few of his communist sympathizer friends like Jane Fonda went before the United States Senate to protest the war and bad mouth his fellow vets. Calling us BABY KILLERS among other things. Now like I said, he got himself a couple Purple Hearts, and at one of the peace rallies while his commie buddies were burning their draft cards, he publicly threw them away. Admitted, keeping or discarding them was his business, but to my way of thinking, in that very act he spat on his country and every G.I. that served in Vietnam. I served in the 'Nam because my country needed me there and I'm dam ed proud that I did.
2007-02-18 14:20:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Lame Eagle 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
John Kerry looked like that dog with the droopy face.
2007-02-18 14:26:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by blcria 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
well bush kept us through 9/11 and prevented other terrorist attacks, the same could not be said of the president before him
and kerry was, a flipflopper, a traitor, and conserned himself to much with the worlds opinion towards us.
2007-02-18 13:35:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
He was the best choice at the time. Kerry might have socialized us after surrendering in Iraq.
2007-02-18 13:41:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by WJ 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
Because John kerry is stupid for calling our troops dumb, and he flip flops on issues. remember, John kerry voted for the war in Iraq.
2007-02-18 13:32:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
What were the numbers 51% Bush and 49% Kerry.
That ain't much of a landslide.
Blue states...i.e with cities that have money and activity.
Red states.... rural welfare states that take in more from the feds than they put in.
But the Republicans don't hold supreme power anymore.
And I want to see those Bible Thumping hypocritical Liars HUMILIATED.
2007-02-18 13:39:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
Kerry just wasn't good enough!
2007-02-18 13:33:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by boricua_lilly 3
·
3⤊
2⤋