On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order 11110, was signed with the authority to basically strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business. This Executive Order has never been repealed, amended, or superceded by any subsequent Executive Order. In simple terms, IT IS STILL VALID!!!
When President John Fitzgerald Kennedy signed this Order, it returned to the federal government, specifically the Treasury Department, the Constitutional power to create and issue currency -money - without going through the privately owned Federal Reserve Banks
2007-02-18
04:47:47
·
28 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
President Kennedy's Executive Order 11110 gave the Treasury Department the explicit authority: "to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury." This means that for every ounce of silver in the U.S. Treasury's vault, the government could introduce new money into circulation based on the silver bullion physically held there. As a result, more than $4 billion in United States Notes were brought into circulation in $2 and $5 denominations. $10 and $20 United States Notes were never circulated but were being printed by the Treasury Department when Kennedy was assassinated. It appears obvious that President Kennedy knew the Federal Reserve Notes being used as the purported legal currency were contrary to the Constitution of the united States of America.
2007-02-18
04:48:01 ·
update #1
For those who wonder why I feel this is a current issue look here:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AqtLxGre28O3i7if6D72mzDsy6IX?qid=20070218091555AAvvb8e
2007-02-18
05:23:06 ·
update #2
There are many theories about the Kennedy assassination, in fact I think there are books, movies, and reams of paperwork from federal investigations.
2007-02-18 04:51:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sweet n Sour 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes you are absolutely right. Come on if THE PEOPLE assassinated presidents so freely Old W would be long gone.
Anyways the federal reserve is the worse fraud ever committed to the American people. Think for a second the government has absolutely nothing to do with it's own currency. It is no longer backed by gold, so basically the money costs about 2cents to produce and that is exactly what it is worth. This scam has been perpetuated by a few elite family's in London. The obvious Rothschild's and others, but their identities are secret and fall under a tittle like the London Crown. It is of interest to know that once the Americans gained independence England was bent on the return of the colonies. A quote of Rothschild's " It matters not what laws a nation make, as long as I control the money the nation is mine. So technically in the early 1900's when the Fed Reserve was finally accepted, unwanted but after the bankers and financiers put runs on the banks and other schemes, people panicked and in taking the Federal Reserve as official currency, effectively The U.S. returned solvency back to England...Mary.
2007-02-23 00:56:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by mary57whalen 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Kennedy was killed because he stood for Civil Rights. The South did not want the black people to have it. They wanted to continue to hold the black people down as they have been since the end of the Civil War. The people in the Southern states were so excited that they were finally getting a "Southern President". They just knew that Johnson would stop the Civil Rights Movement by never signing the bill into office. Well, you know the rest of the story. Johnson was sworn into the Office of President of the United States and he signed the Civil Rights Act. Oh well. there went the slogan "The South Should Rise Again."
2007-02-24 19:44:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by dottygoatbeagle 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
The blogbaba doesn't really know why JFK got killed, but the theory fits as well as any. What I believe is irrelevant, what happened is that the same people accused of killing him over the attempt to regain the sovereignty of United States and rest control of the country from the Fed ended up putting his head on the fifty cent piece as a reminder to the next President who had the same idea. Chilling that they could be so brazen.
Injustice exists in the world, hopefully the atheists are wrong and God gets the killers in the end. It has been my experience people never really get away with anything they do, and most likely the same will hold true for JFK's killers.
2007-02-25 14:40:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by blogbaba 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are absolutely 100% correct. I obtained a copy of E.O. 11110 through the F.O.I.A. and JFK did order the treasury to begin printing United States notes instead of Federal Reserve notes. Doing so was signing his own death warrant by the money-powers (Rothchilds) who knew that Fed notes indebted the people with a stamp tax on each note whereas US notes did no such thing and the people were not held in economic slavery to a family who has been a long time member of the Illuminati.
2007-02-24 19:25:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by 4everamusedw/humanity 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If it were only that simple.
But, look at it this way. Kennedy had a couple of major gaffes going on. One was Cuba. A huge thorn in his side as Khrushchev felt Kennedy was a "mama's boy" for bringing his mom along during peace talks. This ticked off the CIA, big time, because The Bay of Pigs invasion went about as well as Carter trying to invade Iran to rescue the hostages.
Second, lil bro Bobby, as FBI head, strongly cracked down on mafia activites. You do the math there as the mob was a lot more powerful back then.
2007-02-18 04:53:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by MoltarRocks 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
This is an excellent question. I didn't know that was the exact reason. I knew that he was killed because he defied the Globalists in some serious way, but I couldn't remember the exact reason!!! Thank you for posting this. The only way for us to get the power back to the people where it belongs, is for more and more of us to educate ourselves on the parts of History that the Globalists try to keep hidden from us, and then speak out, despite the ridicule and potential danger!!!!! In the end...Right is might!!!!!
2007-02-18 04:57:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Most likely that had little or nothing to do with the Kennedy assassination. Roosevelt had already started the system of credit when the stock market crashed. This was a last attempt to pull our economy from the great depression. Though if your information is entirely correct the shutting down of a bank would piss many people off, I do not think it is within the power of the president or a bank to shut down without paying out or transferring the amount of money needed to cover itself. This happened during World war 2
which caused the stock market to crash. So Roosevelt made many amendments during reconstruction to ensure this did not happen again including loans, insurance, monopoly laws, ect.
2007-02-18 05:07:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Big B 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
I was a former aide to Dick Cheney. I wish to remain anonymous so just call me S-Lib. I have personal information that Karl Rove and Dick Cheney were going to try to discredit her in the press. Unfortunately, we couldn't come up with anything that would make her look worse than she already does. So yeah, we had to kill her. Don't try to contact me I am forgetting this conversation ever took place.
2016-05-24 02:27:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. This is a conspiracy theory. Kennedy's actions were supported by the governors of the Federal Reserve The claim is often linked to the equally farcical claim that because Lincoln introduced paper money to finance the civil war that he was killed by "The Money Power". Sometimes the conspiracist will throw in the assassination of James Garfield for good measure-- or even the crucifixion of Christ (who after all, did kick the money changers out of the temple).
The claim that the Federal Reserve Act is unconstitutional is also unfounded. It is permitted through the "necessary and proper" clause of the Constitution and also the interstate commerce clause. The Act was passed by Congress, signed by Woodrow Wilson and since then has been upheld by case law in several courts. Likewise, the laws that enacted the FIrst and Second Banks of the U.S. were similarly litigated and upheld.
2007-02-18 04:57:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by Voxygen8 4
·
1⤊
5⤋