Still dont believe there is a 9/11 coverup?

Question

Check this out.A book written by the 2 guys who headed up the commission report reporting the problems they are having and why lies are being perpetrated.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14191255/

why? ...........do your research.The media is corporate owned by some of the largest defense contractors in the country

Answer 1

OK, I actually went to the page and read the article. So what. The article talks about a book on investigating the investigating done for the commission. It says nothing about 9/11 being an inside job.

I guess if you are looking for something to boost your belief regarding 9/11, you can find it anywhere you want to.

Answer 2

i'm no longer acquainted with that e book yet i visit examine it out. I even have 2 that i'm recommending that enlightens persons on the 9/11 reality and what is going on besides the end results of it. "The 9/11 cost checklist Omissions and Distortions" via David Ray Griffin "you're no longer stupid! Get the reality" via William John Cox

Answer 3

Oh Lord, I believe! JFK was shot by an ex-CIA agent named Charles Rogers...cell towers send out brainwashing signals...a tribe of Betelgeusians recently conquered all the other tribes and is planning an invasion of North Korea-read all about it, I personally talked to their leader (telepathically, of course)...the Flying Spaghetti Monster lives in Syracuse, New York and is possessed by rectal demons...my father-in-law is Elvis' secret twin brother...Bill Gates is the Antichrist...Numerology will SAVE YOUR LIFE!!!

Actually, I wouldn't at all be surprised if there are lies being perpetrated about 9/11. That's life, son.

Answer 4

These conspiracys will go no where, how come you all can't seem to understand the average person isn't buying it and never will. The media, who hates Bush isn't even picking up on it even tho they don't miss a beat on anything else he does. You shouldn't be so gulliable.

Answer 5

Nope, still don't believe it.

ADDED LATER:
The problem with conspiracy theories is that they use a lack of evidence against their theory as evidence for their theory.

Let me use the same rationale. If the attacks on 9/11 were really perpetrated by the government, then why hasn't any of this incriminating evidence been brought to Bush's millions of enemies? They would do anything to get him out of office, especially expose this supposed "cover-up". If the evidence is so undeniable, then why is Bush still in office?
Does that really make sense?

Answer 6

When I read your question, I thought you were implying a coverup about who caused the 9/11 tragedy or why. The coverup was instead about the incompetence of the Bush administration's response to it.

Answer 7

Very easy to explain to the rest of the sheeple who think this some wacked out conspiracy. Most believe it's a conspiracy due to lack of facts. Ok, now why has hundreds of physicists, demolition experts, policemen, firemen, care givers and such come forth saying it was an inside job. Could it be the fact that 3 buildings allegedly brought down by fire that fell at near freefall speeds with squibs(blast points) visible and crumble into their own footprint possible. Why do you find it hard to believe? Scientific fact has proven it. How come the lease holder Larry Silverstein said on a PBS publication about 9/11 on how he gave the order to "pull(demolition term for bringing down a building using well placed detonators)" the buildings? Maybe there was something to hide. I mean why would a steel building collapse due to fire. None has ever! There was a skyscraper in Madrid, Spain that burned for 19hrs with white hot flames shooting out hundreds of feet into the air, but the structure held fast.

Even if the WTC collapsed due to fire there was 71floors for #1 and like 80something floors for #2. If in fact it did a pancake collapse there would've been some sort of resistance from the following floor. Take for example, if it took a second a floor, that would've been over a minute to collapse. And the fact that the concrete portions of the building were turned into fine powder.

Here's your experiment to try and prove me wrong on this. Drop a concrete block from an altitude of 1000ft. See if it turns into a fine powder when it hits the ground.

Second notion, why was the steel beams that feel, ended up into 30ft sections that were quickly loaded onto trucks to be shipped over seas to Asia to be melted down. And why was there molten metal underneath the rubble 3wks later. That's letting whatever steel cool down for 3WEEKS BEFORE UNCOVERING IT.

3rd notion, why was the lobby of WTC 1 & 2 blown to next to nothing after the plane hits. Remember heat travels up. Also on that, there was a 50ton generator(or some heavy piece of equipment) destroyed in the sub-basement area, before the collapse? Answer me that.

Here's a better question, how was 9/11 not an inside job based on the facts I've presented of how steel buildings react in a collapse.

Answer 8

the only 9/11 cover up i'm aware of is Sandy Burglar stuffing classified documents in his pants to steal them. hm, i wonder what was in those documents that was so important to hide.................................

Answer 9

I am going to try to explain it to you in your own language.

BAAA BAA BAAAA BAAA

Hope that helps. BTW I hear conspiracy.com is giving away probe proof foil helmets to the next 5 people that sign up.

Answer 10

Very strange questions. Maybe hitler wrote it and sold it to MSNBC because their just stupid enough to buy it and offer it to someone that would fall for it.