How you avalía the two theories, alicerçada in the mechanics of the energies of the universe?

Question

a) Of the astrophysical ones, of the nuclear astronomers, and the physicists: Light, atomic waves of the average length caused by the jumps of electrons inside of the atom. (Only Recognizing the nucleus “sun”)
b) of the great atom (universe): That it is divided in three energies: Prótons, Elétrons and Nêutrons. In the sun, it was the positive power (Prótons), but with the negative return (electrons). In the Interstellar system, it was the negative power (electrons), but with the positive return (Prótons). In what it says respect to the land, was with the responsibility of the Nêutrons, acting the end to unbalance the positive and negative forces in its related limits. Thus, it neutralizes the start and the extremity. The energies that come of the place for where to go, and go for the place of where they come. As the diagram of Tarcísio Brito (...).

Answer 1

avalia sums to the three powers

Answer 2

considering the fact that there's a finite volume of mass and capability in the universe, if all of it became into switched over to capability in a universe increasing swifter and swifter, the universe would finally end up with much less and much less capability consistent with unit volume. this does not look as though the thank you to start a clean massive bang, that's meant at the beginning very extreme capability density and espresso volume. I truthfully have yet another theory. the expansion is accelerating now, so in case you "run it backwards" you will have a universe shrinking and decelerating because it went. If it became into decelerating on the main appropriate value it ought to by no ability attain 0 length. So thinking the forward direction in that mild; possibly the universe by no ability had a huge bang; possibly it became into continually greater desirable than 0 length and increasing. The farther lower back in time the slower the expansion. it ought to have been under one cubic meter in volume, increasing at under a millionth of a meter consistent with 2d, and accelerating at a very sluggish value trillions and trillions of years in the past working example. yet I truthfully have by no ability heard this theory proposed by ability of any specialists so I anticipate the value of acceleration isn't top to help that concept.