www.costofwar.com
2007-02-18 01:36:20 · 7 answers · asked by Richard O 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No. I don't think a dime should have been spent on Iraq considering the reason for this war (apparently) was the twin towers being attacked. After all these were planes that flew from airports within American by people living in America. The enemy in within America,not outside!
2007-02-18 02:03:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course it isn't. Because the real conservative candidate was Michael Badnarik.
Dems want to be your mommy. Repubs want to be your daddy.
Libertarians want you to grow up.
2007-02-18 09:40:10 · answer #2 · answered by mamasquirrel 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No it is necessary, now get your head out of the sand an go visit ground zero!
2007-02-18 09:41:01 · answer #3 · answered by pretender59321 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
So you want to cut funding for the troops in harms way?
2007-02-18 09:40:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
depends on how you look at it.
what would the cost of war be if it were here on our own soil? Probably lots more than your figure.
2007-02-18 09:40:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately it is not being "spent"!
It is being squandered, lost, and stolen!
And we can thank the Republicans for this!
2007-02-18 09:42:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
yes it is!!!!!
2007-02-18 09:39:40 · answer #7 · answered by SWT 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋