...be penalised for tax evasion?
2007-02-17 21:24:50 · 13 answers · asked by Moorglademover 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
You raise a good point Moorglade! To it you can add people who don't use the tollway system, restaurants, hotels, etc.
Come to think of it, the only thing that I can think of that doesn't pile on with a lot of user taxes, etc., is vending machines. Everything is included in the price of the product you buy, whether it be a condom or a can of soda !
2007-02-17 22:04:37 · answer #1 · answered by briang731/ bvincent 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is probably next.I smoke and have had to cut way back do to all the taxation,and pressure.I never lit up in a closed area always go outside away from people but that isn't good enough.
2007-02-18 05:29:14 · answer #2 · answered by one10soldier 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. That's 'tax avoidance' which is legal, not 'tax evasion' which isn't. They have chosen not to do these things and therefore avoided paying the tax.
2007-02-18 07:09:53 · answer #3 · answered by Sioned 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
boring and unadventourous people
who will eventually be the healthiest
people laying in the graveyard
should have to pay a levy
or vat on every health checkup
"Good point" they are awarded
by the checkup examiner
2007-02-18 05:45:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
penalised no !! they are still living with their mummys (aged 28 plus) know no better ?
2007-02-18 05:49:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
good question - I dont smoke and I dont drive but I do make up for it with drink, so do I get away with it?
2007-02-18 05:34:21 · answer #6 · answered by brien123 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
An interesting new concept
2007-02-18 05:29:18 · answer #7 · answered by trumps 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No they should be rewarded for not doing any of those bad things
2007-02-18 05:32:57 · answer #8 · answered by Teenage Drama Queen 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What a good question. Yes I think they should.
2007-02-18 05:37:46 · answer #9 · answered by derek 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, actually they should be given a bonus for not damaging the ozone layer etc !!!!
2007-02-18 05:26:56 · answer #10 · answered by anney 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋