English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

It certainly looks like it. BushOilco is doing the same verbal run up to Iran they did to Iraq. WMD's, home to terrorists, danger to their neighbors, evil leader, etc., and they consistently threaten the country, including positioning Naval Fleets off the Iranian coast. Iran is the last oil nation in the region not submissive to the Bush plan, and Bush has them surrounded by Afghanistan, Iraq and our fleet. I think Bush will attack them on the Iraq border, trying to bait them into a fight, increasing the rhetoric about aiding the terror in Iraq and killing our troops, when actually 90% of our troop deaths come at the hands of the Sunnis who are being financed by the Saudis, not Iran. I believe they intend to do this by the end of this year, if not sooner, and the question is, does Congress have the backbone to stop this before BushOilCo gets us into WW III.

2007-02-17 20:40:56 · answer #1 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 1 0

Before next elections, no. Before next Presidential elections? Probably.
And why not?We should have gone there in the first place instead of Iraq.
Republicans are running this country into the ground faster than an alcoholic on nickel beer night with a fist full of hundreds. They are writing checks our people can't cash. Seems only logical to completely over-extend ourselves and invade another country that we have no business bothering.

I'm voting for whoever runs on the Republican ticket in 2008, and hope they keep fighting illegal wars.

2007-02-17 20:40:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

If Iran stops pursuing their Nuclear objectives and forestalls threatening the international, particular. It has no longer something to do with the 2008 elections. that is all approximately fending off a nuclear attack from Iran or the fabric entering into the incorrect palms.

2016-11-23 16:18:38 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

It is quite possible. I would feed them a couple of nukes just so they know what they re playing with. But, we cannot do that because it goes against world opinion. Anyway, it would be a great move because it would fall in the lap of the next President.

As for troops, they would have to institute the draft to fight Iran. Or, drop a couple nukes like I said earlier. Oh well.

2007-02-17 21:01:45 · answer #4 · answered by Mr Mojo Risin 4 · 0 0

Wel I don't really know. Us brittanys do not follow normal politics you see we actually have our own entire world of brittany politics but we do not pay attensions to that eather of coarse. THat's just my 2 cents -- IO could be wrong and every1 has there own opinion. Let's dig up to get to the fact of the matter! When u read u r empowered. Read ur local news pappers. Do not read Sigh Times. That is a magazine for Cracksighs. Thank u 4 reading. Just my 2centzz. holal at rims.

2007-02-17 20:40:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Man,I sure as hell hope not.We do not want to extend this war into Iran.That will,in my eyes,only bring down more pissed off Muslims upon our nation.I really don't want to have to start peaking around corners with my children before I take them somewhere.

2007-02-17 21:33:27 · answer #6 · answered by one10soldier 6 · 1 0

If he does there is obviously a hidden criteria for oil domination he won`t, mind you I thought he would`nt invade iraq. fat lot i know.

2007-02-17 20:47:52 · answer #7 · answered by oobedoo 1 · 0 0

Why do you like Yoda write?

2007-02-17 20:44:52 · answer #8 · answered by Fearless Leader 4 · 0 0

Probably!!

2007-02-17 20:43:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers