Do you believe in Darwin's evolution theory? Pls read bellow.?

Question

* Evolution is a theory not a fact.
* creation is a logic fact.
* Evolution means developement & adaption.
* Evelution doesn't mean changing from one species to another.
* Every species got its unique cromosome number & DNA.
* If someone lose a hand or leg, the other hand will adapt to more skill to satisfy the needs of that person, which with a normal person , those skill are not found.
If a person is poor & without shoes, his heet's bottom will become thick & hard to resist the walking on the rough grounds.
If a person lose his vision or hearing, he will become more skillful in detecting the sound direction & reading the movement of lips & bodies. THIS IS WHAT THE ACUAL MEANING OF EVOLUTION WORD.
* Millions of live species have never changed, every one is engineered to its task ,eating, hunting & protecting itself.

* If u believe your origin is monkey, then do a DNA test, if it matches the monkey's then u r an animal, not a human .BUT IF NOT , THROW AWAY FROM UR MIND.

Answer 1

Darwin's ideas are useful to help us understand natural selection and adaptation, but even Darwin himself recognised the leap of faith required to accept his ideas as more than that.

Answer 2

This has been the ultimate question for thealogians of both the Sciences and Religion ,since Darwins conception of it .It ran head long into the fury of the Church blasting it as Heiracy , and branding Darwin as a marked man . He had many death threats after the realease of his theory , from religous , God fearing folk who where willing to break a commandment in his name . Do I beleive in the 6 day creation ... No why ? being a person of a reasonable educational , well above the standards available in the time of the conception of the Bible , I am not so taken in by storytellers earning a living in the market place . We also have to remember to many , Genesis is merely a theory . Darwin did show that species intermix , he did show this from Skeletal remains and fossils . That same or alike species had evolved , and that sometimes well beyond their original forms. As for instance most of the birds we see around us today , are actually decendants of the Dinosaur . This is undisputable fact proven by many scientific discoveries over the last millenia , so why do people still call his paper a theory. And one must also remember the DNA may not be so different from then , as it was possibly only one species of Ape that did indeed evolve . look at the differences in the Ape populations now , surely it is not inconcievable that one of them may be our ancestors. Ah but to accept that brings the religous theory of creation into dissrepute so therefore it will never be resolved , well not untill one or the other fades away . And with Church attendances the numbers that they are and the world in its present state not too far away ? .

Answer 3

Look. English is obviously not your first language, and so i mean no disrespect.

But why do you think you are an authority on the meaning of a word in English? Much less, a specific use of that word within the science of Biology? ... When you are clearly not an English speaker, much less a scientist, much less a biologist?

It is so easy to prove you wrong ... just by looking in a dictionary!
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/evolution

"ev·o·lu·tion
- Biology. change in the gene pool of a population from generation to generation by such processes as mutation, natural selection, and genetic drift."

That is the meaning of the word in Biology. There are other uses of the word in English ... NONE of which means "developmen & adaptation" of an individual (such as compensating for the loss of a hand).

Do you have another dictionary, an encyclopedia, some other source that disagrees? Anything?

Otherwise your question just proves that you don't even know the meaning of the word, much less the *theory* that you are disagreeing with. (And so there is no point on also pointing out your glaring lack of understanding of the word "theory" in science. You are so obviously not a scientist, and your other questions reveal a consistent desire not to learn anything at all, that to try and explain things to you would be wasted energy.)

If you want to disagree with evolution, then disagree with it, and give logical reasons why. (You provided not a single one.) But don't say that dictionaries, English-speakers, and scientists don't know what the word 'evolution' means and you do. That just undermines everything else you say.

Answer 4

When did creation become elevated to a 'logic fact'? And just exactly what *is* a logic fact anyway??

One thing I'm glad to see is that someone who obviously doesn't speak English very well is *still* willing to discourse at length about the meaning of words he can't correctly spell with high consistency. But it proves that there *is* a shallow end to the gene pool.

But, like most who don't know anything about Darwinism (or much else), you make the fatal flaw of saying evolution means we descended from monkeys. It simply isn't so. What evolution says is that both man and monkeys had a common ancester many millions of years ago.

And, if you test human DNA against primate DNA, there is a 98% correlation. That makes us very, *very* close cousins on the evolutionary tree.


Doug

Answer 5

Adapting to your specific environment eg, Eskimos living in freezing, doesnt mean their polar bears.Life finds a way in any circumstance that they are placed.
Dont forget evolution takes millions of years.You said if we were monkeys do a dna test. It wouldnt work. It would show we are human we just share the simliar genes as that of monkeys we just assumed we developed that way.
Monkeys back then just didnt say oh im just going to walk on 2 legs rather than 4.Time is the key.
Evolution maybe that in millions of years humans may develop more and be more intelligent...No one knows were assuming again.
Its what evolution means to you as an individual.People have their own theories about it, and only time will tell what the future may show us.

Answer 6

Wrong, wrong wrong, big time.

Evolution is an observed fact, not just one or a few theories.

Biological evolution is the observed change in populations of animals over time and has nothing or little to do with the adaptation of an amputee.

Creation has not a shred of evidence to support it.

The human eye, when properly considered, is evidence against "intelligent design".

Almost all the "evidence" put forward by creationists is at best mistaken and already been dismissed, not only by scientists but sometimes by theologians as well.

At worst, the evidence for "creation" has been deliberately misinterpreted or even falsified. This was a speciality of one well known creationist proponent who kept propagating lies even after he had admitted that his material was false.

The evidence for evolution fills many hundred meters of library shelves and is in peer reviewed publications.

Your DNA is virtually identical to that of a chimpanzee or a gorilla, neither of which are monkeys. Get your facts straight. It is also virtually identical to that of a horse, dog or any other mammal and has sequences in common with those of grasses.

Answer 7

Your mind is full of religious nonsense. Read some or all of
Richard Dawkins books.
He was educated at Oxford University and has taught zoology at the universities of California and Oxford. He is the Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University. His books about evolution and science include The Selfish Gene, The Extended Phenotype, The Blind Watchmaker, River Out of Eden, Climbing Mount Improbable, and most recently, Unweaving the Rainbow

Answer 8

Evolution is a fact.Developement and adaptation occur only in one generation. Evolution is the modification occuring over several generations.. The change from one species to another is very much possible. Diseases like Trisomy 21 also called mangolism prove that gene numbers can change between parents and offspring. Humans with XXX,also are existing. Deaf man lip reading etc are adaptations not modifications. Even present humans are gradually evolving to become better humans,taller,and more intelligent.When your father ,mother and yourself have three types of DNA fingerprints does it disprove they are your parents?

Answer 9

This guy is completely right...

Do you have any sense at all, your dna is completely individual to you, and to find a match would only be a close match, usually a family member with whom you share DNA.

And can I just add, the whole creation story? Yes, that's what it is, a story. Not fact. A story, told by many, although probably only written by those who it was written by as very few people would have been able to write, so a few people, wrote down their IDEAS into a STORY.

Answer 10

You must be christian.
Read Capra, he explains evolution very clearly. It's all about cooperation of systems to adapt to changing environments.
And you're missing too many things into one pot.
Creation is not a logic fact! It's neither a fact nor logic. Get educated.

Answer 11

ONLY IN AMERICA, educational laughing stock of the planet.
Not actually a question but a politically motivated religious statement and thereofre in the wrong section as well.