A life without a wife and children doesn't have to be lonely. It can be immensely satisfying. Things are never as simple as A or B.
2007-02-17 20:05:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Bethany 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
You helped making the children, didn't you? Then you are responsible for them as much as your wife is.
Choose a loving life with your wife and children, and they'll stop nagging. I think you need to look within yourself for more answers and better choices, because there certainly are more than the two you mention.
2007-02-17 20:06:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Amelie 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
if u do had choice "b" u can change that bitter life with nagging wife and children because u r a part of it!
for sure ur wife will feel the same about u, and i u changed it she can be changed..
choice "a" is very negative and it sounds like running
2007-02-17 20:20:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by B for bernadetta 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If this is you, I would wish you find a third choice. A life without a nagging wife, but still contact with your children.
2007-02-17 20:03:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by I love you too! 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If free-will is about such hopeless choices, I would be better off without the privilege..... at least I need not blame myself for choosing.
However, since you have asked, let me answer anyway. I would prefer to be lonely for the time being, since that gives a hope and scope of a better future..... may find a wife who may not be nagging, who knows?
2007-02-17 20:11:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by small 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lonely life without a nagging husband and without kids.
2007-02-17 21:09:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Barbara V 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would choose the 2nd one. Because loneliness is bitter, and it's not known until you get a bit old. and having a family (even a nagging spouse) is sweet, and it's not known until you get a little bit old.
well I'm talking in general, there could be some exceptions in both.
2007-02-17 20:10:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by hana 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Since I'm already living the "a" answer, I would choose the "b" answer, out of sheer curiosity.
I'm a firm advocate of the philosophy, "Better to have loved and lost than to have never loved at all." I'm 25 and have never had a date in my life (meaning, I also haven't had certain other things, either), and I'm being criticized about my depression by a few people who have just broken up with their girlfriends.
...but I tell them that they can never know what it's like to be in my shoes, because they are younger than me and have already dated.
Truly I say to you, it is worse to have never been "loved." I mean, a person who has loved and lost gets sad, but a person who has never known it doesn't know if he/she ever will, or if he/she ever can experience it.
Therefore the correct answer is "b."
2007-02-17 20:06:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by perfectlybaked 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
a) lonely life without wife and children
lonely ones are free, in every way
2007-02-17 21:20:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Here we go again with one of those either/or questions. Isn't there a middle ground? The answer is purely subjective and as such will vary with each individual.
2007-02-17 22:11:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by emiliosailez 6
·
0⤊
0⤋