I agree because the American people elected them and everyone knows voting is a sign of stupidity.
2007-02-17 18:57:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Perhaps it is the examples they set that give us all cause for concern. The standout democrats like Kennedy, Kerry, Pelosi, Clinton and Gore have demonstrated a great love of giving speeches and then taking actions that conflict with their stated positions. Now another generation of Kennedy madness has come to the scene. Look at those great people from Mass. Two Kennedy's, Kerry and Barney Franks. The gay man's image of the perfect American. The mental abilities of all the above seem to reflect many imbalances that make them perfect democrats. Pelosi is still trying to figure out how to straddle a urinal so she can use the men's room.
2007-02-18 23:53:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by mr conservative 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Democrats these days are notoriously stupid. It is a shame too. The Democratic party has a great history to it, with such fine Presidents as James Madison, Andrew Jackson, FDR, Harry Truman and JFK.
Nowadays, it is contaminated with such idiots as Clinton, Carter, "Howlin" Howard Dean, Obama, Kerry, Pelosi, "ABSCAM" Murtha and others. Do I really need to elaborate on how stupid these people are? Just watch the news with an open mind...you'll see.
I will stay Republican. George "W" is a way better alternative to those knuckleheads
2007-02-18 03:50:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by john p 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because they are socialists who want America to be a country no different then France. Universal healthcare that doesn't work, welfare programs, huge Gov't and a lousy national defense, Anti patriot act, I could go on forever. They want to get rid of everthing that is the heart & soul of America, Free enterprise and such things as state of personal business, i.e. raising kids. They don't understand that we are at War & people are trying to kill us & convert us to Radical islam. They are completely oblivious & want to go back living the Clinton era of hear no evil see no evil speak no evil. Also, they don't lead with there convictions they're propelled by agendas. They want right to privacy so no one sees them do wrong. They are Pro-green, but refuse to get rid of there SuV's driving all over washington. These are just some reasons why they are a bunch of idiots. I wish the Avg American could see past the total liberal media & see what really goes on.
2007-02-18 05:56:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Minilover 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't think either party is "brighter" in office than another. Each party brings in their own plans, their own policies. During each election, each party/candidate presents what he or she wishes to do when in office. Then the people decide. In November, they picked the Democrats, because a majority of Americans choose their ideals as the way to go. Calling the Democrats not bright is like calling a majority of all Americans not bright.
2007-02-18 03:00:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by amg503 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
The democrats are the most promiscuous but not the dumbest. Read the "W" dictionary sometime. He's a republican and an idiot. Any Republican who claims to love the truth has to admit - after all of the idiotic things Bush has said and done - that he is an idiot. In fact, he is the king of the idiots. Republicans aren't any brighter though. They keep believing that republicans will overturn Roe V. Wade and the republican politicians keep appointing judges they know will not overturn Roe V. Wade because it keeps their core voters going to the polls and voting for them. We need a new party in this country!!!!
2007-02-18 03:14:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Guardian 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yep, I agree. Their brightest light burned out 30 yrs. ago. They have been standing on a chair, to put a new bulb in that fixture, instead of one person, it takes 5. One to hold the bulb, while the other 4 turns the chair.
2007-02-18 03:06:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by m c 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
and those who focus on puppet political parties when Chase Bank owns all others - aren't the brightest either.
remember the anti-masonic party of 1830's? what happened to them again? i dare ya to check ;)
2007-02-18 02:58:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by honorablepassion 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
as long as they are a little brighter than what we got in the white house now.
2007-02-18 23:52:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You're funny
2007-02-18 02:58:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by PaddyIrishMan 2
·
1⤊
1⤋