I have had my suspicions about that too. Lots of money means lots of motive. I found this interesting as well " Approximately one in three homicides of females is committed by current or former spouses or boyfriends, a group collectively referred to as intimate partners "
2007-02-17 17:08:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
It's not about the money now, it is about Danielynn. I cannot judge Howard in this case because we only see what the media tells us on TV. I am sure there is alot more to this story than what meets the eye... The media plays such a big roll in making someone look good or bad. Also, you would think that a grown adult would be responsible for themselves. If you look at past footage of Anna Nicole, she was as sharp as a whip. She seemed to have deteriorated within the past 5 years... The question is what caused all of that? It could have been all sorts of things, however, it is not for us to judge her or those surrounding her. Leave that up to the courts where all the evidence will be layed out.
Rest in Peace Anna Nicole and Daniel.
2007-02-20 02:23:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Time4Tivo 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't believe that Howard K. Stern is suspicious. I think he enabled Anna to do some bad things but I don't believe he had anything to do with the deaths of her or her son.
I hope he is the father because Anna never wanted her baby to be around her "mother" and if Larry Burkhead is the father, he will let the baby see that evil woman.
2007-02-21 05:00:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Libby 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, I am not suspicious of Howard K. Stern. What earthly, or unearthly reason, would Mr. Stern have to cause the deaths of Anna Nicole Smith or her son?
I am suspicious of the media exploitation of her life, death of her son, and of her. If Anna Nicole Smith sought notoriety, she can rest wherever she is knowing that she got it. What price glory?
Anna Nicole and her son, Daniel are no longer in "harms way". Pray for the child left behind. What is her future?
2007-02-17 17:44:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Baby Poots 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
If I were to be searching for a description of Howard --- suspicious would not be on that list !!
peculiar--crazy (not the good kind)--odd-- unbalanced---
extreme (not the good kind)---self absorbed (the worst kind)
and a jerk (the absolute biggest kind) --- But not suspicious !!
I really don't think that this guy is a killer of any sort--- I simply
believe he has been in over his head in the circus that he created of his life for a good number of years now and is just at the center of the center ring OF that circus right now !!
2007-02-17 17:13:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
In 95% of murders, when a woman is the victim, the perp is a husband or boyfriend. I am with you on this. He seems creepy. He had access to all of her meds/drugs.
2007-02-17 17:06:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by whrldpz 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
yes i have too thought about that, shes worth a lot of money too so thats a good enough motive for any killer..
2007-02-17 17:01:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by chichibaby 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Oh yeah.........I think that he is guilty of some shenanigans......however I don't think he is Dannilyns daddy........
I really do think that .....( and please don't laugh or dismiss me as a nut )......Her dead son is ( or was ) the babydaddy.......it sure is a messed up situation.....
2007-02-17 17:03:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by PigPen 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
suspicious about what. her death her money her kids what??
2007-02-21 14:22:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by duc602 7
·
0⤊
1⤋