2007-02-17 16:45:30 · 7 answers · asked by sure s 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Surely yes. They are more equipped then men. My boss never scolds the receptionist whenever she's late. But when it comes to me, I have to face hell. There are even chances that my salary could be deducted. Reason - she is is equipped with her womanhood.
Else if they face the world like a man does, there's no way they can beat the men.
I hate girls...
:-)
2007-02-19 06:16:56 · answer #1 · answered by plato's ghost 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I hope I am understanding question properly.
YES OF COURSE, Girls can beat boys in what ever things they undertake.
No girls will undertake the task which mmd says.
The only thing is they should DREAM, ASPIRE and WORK HARD towards that.
There are 1 Million Examples on earth to prove my statement.
2007-02-18 02:27:28 · answer #2 · answered by Sir Ramki 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Females have combat support roles in the US armed services including attack aircraft but physical demands in
actual ground attacks requires more upper body strength
than non-male torso allows. There are exceptions in both sexes,
yes, but overall training excludes individualism. The unit value
is everything. Choice of weapon parts must be standard. No
custom fittings are allowed. Military edge is not blunted by
individual sex. Aerial missiles & bullets from women will kill.
2007-02-18 19:36:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
well its tough to give answer to this question it depends upon the situation and i think girlz can almost beat boys but not full maybe..
2007-02-18 01:04:20 · answer #4 · answered by karteek 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The day a girl can sign her name with urine in a snowbank, I'll say yes.
2007-02-18 00:49:19 · answer #5 · answered by mmd 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i'm with mmd on this one.
2007-02-18 01:02:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
noway !
2007-02-18 02:57:08 · answer #7 · answered by chittoor 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋