umm i think they're both kind of equal.. i think it's all about the people living there.. who's trendy, and who's not. i'm VERY trendy, i'm in school for fashion and merchandising, and am an intern for InStyle magazine. i live near LA... but i have friends who live in NY that are very trendy.. i think it's kinda mixed.
xox jen
2007-02-17 15:22:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by beach blondie xox 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
New York
2007-02-17 14:49:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There's no difference really, New Yorkers used to have great, original fashion senses, now they wear the same mass-market stuff as everybody else.
Oh, and now, what New Yorkers think is original is just plain fugly, they've been infected with "The Emperor's New Clothes" syndrome for years now. They think everything different is good, newsflash: No it's not, it's not interesting or statement-making, it's just fugly.
2007-02-17 14:53:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by cleo715 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
New York, because that's where most of the designers and magazine publications are. LA has a more laid back style for the sun.
2007-02-17 14:48:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by kiwikiwi 1
·
3⤊
0⤋
New York of course California has a more laid back sense of style... and its just not that fashionable
2007-02-17 14:45:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by encantame. 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
I live in California so of course we have the better fashion sense haha. But really........NY
2007-02-17 14:48:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Maddie 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Los Angelas has a much more unique style than new york. people in new york are label whores.
2007-02-17 14:43:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by nαrcíssα [misses being a TC] 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Neww York! lol
2007-02-17 15:13:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
new york,but london is the fashion capitol of the world
2007-02-17 15:09:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by BaBy gUrL 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
NYC for sure...all LA cares about is showing off their newly purchased breasts
2007-02-17 14:47:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋