Most likely Sweden and Switzerland.
Sweden came close to entering WW2, the cabinet had actually voted to intervene in the Finnish Winter War, but the Prime Minister refused to ask the King for a Declaration. (Popular opinion was in favor of such action as well. In fact, the cabinet resigned not long after this.) Aside from this, the last time Sweden was in combat was the Napoleonic Wars. Although animosity with Russia has been a part of Swedish military planning since Gustavus Adolphus (in fact, the term for "Russian" in Swedish vernacular is "old enemy".)
Switzerland has had a policy of well-armed neutrality since the Napoleonic Wars as well. Swiss troops formed part of the Grande Armee. During WW2 the Germans had drawn "Case Blue" which was a proposed invasion of Switzerland, to assist the attack on France. Both the formidable terrain, defenses, and the fact that the French and British collapsed quickly canceled that plan. During the Cold War, what is not maybe widely known is that there were some contacts between the Swiss General Staff, and NATO planners. Though certainly no combined exercises with NATO forces.
2007-02-17 17:21:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by jim 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Switzerland.
2007-02-17 14:21:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Switzerland has not had a war that I know of since the times of John Calvin and the battle between Protestants and Catholics in the country. That would be the 17th century.
2007-02-17 16:13:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by bumpocooper 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
a foul concept, undeniable and straightforward. here is why: * the protection stress is a barbaric and previous corporation whose sole objective is to *kill human beings*. Any society that compels human beings to take part in that has some severe subject concerns. have been the potential for opposed components no longer modern, i might help the completed abolition of the protection stress. There are virtually no situations, the place human beings ought to be forced to take part in it. * it would postpone the creation of little ones into the artwork stress, the place they might easily do a little good. An employer dedicated entirely to killing human beings could make contributions little to sought after society. I, working example, think of that i've got been able to make contributions plenty to society in my modern place (I artwork in scientific examine). i could have been able to make contributions precisely no longer something interior the protection stress. Granted, you do impose specific standards for nationwide provider that should possibly exclude regulation-abiding and perplexing-working voters. notwithstanding, are those standards rather honest? Your suggestion is reminiscent of asserting "being on welfaref or over a year ought to be a prosecutable offence punishable by utilizing compelled exertions". call me gentle, yet i might say that this type of suggestion is slightly over-the-top. Granted, I even have complained approximately intense welfare formerly, yet my answer may be to in basic terms shrink welfare money off after a year, no longer stress human beings to connect the army. the way I see it, in case you do no longer want to make contributions to society, the government ought to purely no longer pay for you. there is not any might desire to waste money and devote further human rights violations to resolve the concern. i will additionally factor out which you look to think of that nationwide provider is a magic treatment-all that should turn each lazy dropkick into an upstanding member of society. there is not any evidence to help that, and in certainty the US military started out requiring that recruits end intense college because of the fact they have been having self-discipline subject concerns with uneducated recruits. and that i purely can no longer accept as true with you that a year interior the army can gain magical consequences that are thoroughly previous any psychological technique wide-unfold to guy. If changing human beings's personalities and attitudes grew to become into that straightforward, plenty greater of it may be occurring.
2016-12-17 18:35:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Switzerland because supposely thats where all the world's banks are located
2007-02-17 15:58:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Yvette 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
India has not attacked any country for more than 2000 yrs
2007-02-17 14:19:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋