English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

20 answers

Striaght or gay?

2007-02-17 13:50:54 · answer #1 · answered by JackJester 5 · 0 0

When they are in line with the certain member of the body the shorts are supposed to cover that is too short. Me myself believe a little above the knees is too short

2007-02-17 21:47:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

getting a little more than 2 inches above the knee are too short for most guys to wear and not be considered short shorts.
It honestly depends also on the length of your legs.

2007-02-17 21:45:52 · answer #3 · answered by pixidust 2 · 1 1

I feel like above the knee is too short. It makes me think of those 80's people with bright colored shorts. That's just my opinion.

2007-02-17 21:45:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

You know those little 70's basketball outfits? Those were too short. Add about four inches to those, and that's where the line should be drawn.

2007-02-17 21:57:34 · answer #5 · answered by Nikki 6 · 0 0

If they are jean shorts and not for golf then...
about 4 inches above the knee

2007-02-17 21:46:21 · answer #6 · answered by divaL 3 · 0 1

um if they are tight and 2- 4 inches aove your knee they are too short

2007-02-17 21:45:12 · answer #7 · answered by TK's Baby Cake 2 · 0 0

Hello! Speedos! If old guys in Florida can wear em, you can wear your shorts as short as you want.

2007-02-17 21:49:52 · answer #8 · answered by kiera70 5 · 0 0

They are definately too short when the ars* cheeks are visible, and quite a turn off me actually.

2007-02-17 21:45:51 · answer #9 · answered by jammer 6 · 0 0

above the knee is the point at which shorts get DORKY for guys.

2007-02-17 21:44:54 · answer #10 · answered by Jason P 2 · 1 0

No shorter than knee length for out and about. If you are doing exersise, a little shorter is okay too.

2007-02-17 21:56:39 · answer #11 · answered by volleyball girl 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers