I mean it takes alot of courage to do something like that.
2007-02-17 13:12:24 · 20 answers · asked by Perplexed 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think so
The hardest part was keeping it under 100 words. The House didn't want it to be harder to read than "My Pet Goat"
Go big Red Go
2007-02-17 13:40:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
You just wait, we will show you ALOT more courage when we force Bush to withdraw our troops. Then you will think that is cowardly too. Which means that no matter what we do we will be called cowards. Unless of course we back down ( which of course wouldn't be cowardly in your opinion) and give Bush what he wants.
Instead, what would be courage to you would be Bush not having the integrity to admit he screwed while he lets thousands of American soldiers die.
Just because the beginning doesn't take much courage, doesn't mean that we are not willing to eventually use as much courage as needed. You understand the concept. It's like when Bush sternly told Saddam that he should allow American inspectors inside of Iraq to look for WMDs. He ended up invading. Talk softly but carry a big stick. Do you understand the point now, you stupid bi tch ?
2007-02-17 22:32:44 · answer #2 · answered by Count Acumen 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm sure they all feel better now that they have excluded themselves from the war in Iraq and haveing the option of blameing someone else in case there is an attack on America. How nice it would be when the ones elected stop seeing us as morons. The demos are dodging responsibility to the outcome of national security with all this time wasteing their doing. Common sense tells us the more troops the less casualtys along with less time in Iraq. It hurts me and soo many others seeing these "few" trying to do what takes 100000 more to accomplish. No the congress does not support the ones fighting and risking their lives so these imbosiles can live the life of luxary. Pelosi, hillary and all the others crying about Bush is wrong should be slapped until they wake up. Big deal about 'debt', we have ALWAYS had debt, even when we got attacked we were indebt.Security first and the debt problem afterwards. I know if I were there and only 10 of us instead of 100, I'd be ready to come home and kick the sh-it out of a democrate.
2007-02-17 21:29:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
LOL thats fantastic!! All the hubub and thats exactly what it is a sternly worded memo. Give it a rest and Hillary/McCain didnt even have the courage to vote on that!!! Nice one!! This is the single most BS drag your feet baloney imaginable. American people are dying over there we will leave sooner or later!! It will collapse into civil war or another totalitarian regime sooner or later!!
2007-02-17 21:22:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Lol.
Which method was that? Tell me?
I'm sure it took no courage at all, sending "sternly worded messages" is what politics is often all about. Now the democrats have more presentation in government, they have more negotiating room.
Republicans did the same thing to Clinton when the tables were turned.
2007-02-17 21:18:12 · answer #5 · answered by rostov 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
How about Bush stating the troops are going no matter what anybody else says, on schedule without proper rest, training in insurgency tactics, or proper armor? You support that?
People like you must not care about the lives of our soldiers, put in the hands of failure like Bush. Every soldier killed means you guys win, and our Nation loses our heroes for NO good reason.
I hope some day you will be tried as a traitor to this great nation, since you want to supply our enemy with human targets.
2007-02-17 21:19:43 · answer #6 · answered by NightShade 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I'll bet they do.
Didn't they,under Clinton,send some sternly worded memos to Saddam and that jerk in Somalia.
2007-02-17 21:19:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Excellent question. They have now spent all of their energy initiating a non binding resolution. Congratulations.
How many of them will deny ever reading the fine print and signing the resolution in the first place if Bush's latest strategy works in securing Baghdad? How many will claim they were "tricked" into signing it?
Should Bush's new strategy be successful - you will witness the greatest flip-flopping events since they were reminded of their votes to go to war in the first place.
2007-02-17 21:23:04 · answer #8 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Republicans sent it, too. Senator Arlen Specter (R) smacked Bush around some :). Keep in mind that Bush's 32%ers are fringe neocons.
2007-02-17 21:17:56 · answer #9 · answered by Crybaby Conservatives 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yeah I agree! Next thing ya know they may even have strongly worded press releases and photo opportunities just to show how they can save lives.
2007-02-17 21:20:05 · answer #10 · answered by copestir 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋