wHO WOULD WIN BETWEEN TNA VS WWE?

Question

I THINK WWE WOULD WIN,BUT TNA WILL DOMINATE,WWE WOULD HAVE TO CHEAT IN ORDER TO WIN.TNA IS MORE REAL THAN WWE.

BUT I STILL THINK THAT TNA IS ON THE RISE,AND WWE IS STARTING TO FALL,AND HOPEFULLY-CENA,BATISTA,AND ORTAN WILL SEE THE LIGHT

Answer 1

So what, HULKAMANIA STILL RULES!!!

Answer 2

WWE would beat the hell out of TNA WWE has Khali, Umaga, Kane, Undertaker, Shawn Michaels, John Cena, Batista and A LOT more and TNA has nobody except Sting, Samoa Joe, Kurt Angle and Abyss. WWE doesn't even need to fight them, all the WWE has to do is scare the **** out of TNA like Khali and Undertaker going to TNA and kicking everybodys ***. TNA vs. WWE almost happened during the end of 2005 because VKM waanted to go to war against DX but Mr. McMahan didn't like the idea so he didn't do anything.

Answer 3

This is a good opportunity to thank Mr. McMahon for all the great talent he has let go to the TNA franchise. WWE has become the training grounds for TNA. Christian. Angle. The list goes on and on. Heck even D'Lo Brown was with TNA a while after WWE let him go.

TNA is only getting bigger and better. Every time WWE does the same tiredass stories they have become famous for - every time Stephanie McMahon talks on a microphone - every time HHH wins a title - every time Edge cheats to win.... It's all the same stuff over and over, and people get sick of it. It's things like that happening again and again that will convince more people to give TNA a try.

So thanks Vince, for making TNA better over time. They are on the verge of making some real noise in the world of pro wrestling. Some of their farm kids like AJ Styles and Chris Sabin are solid enough to dominate in WWE, and you could have had them, but you let TNA get em. WOOT, good job Vince.

Who wins today? WWE. Who knows what tomorrow brings. Cheers, here's to TNA continuing to grow.

Answer 4

I don't know what you are talking about, last 5 years, WWE has beaten their stock predictions and continue to impress on the stock market. Financially, WWE is dominant over any other company. The only reason their superstars don't wrestle has good is because backstage politicking has put a restriction on what they can do because they don't want them to get injured. Has for who would win, financially WWE, in pro wrestling, that would be for the two companies to sort out backstage and in a real fight, WWE has to many big men to lose.

Answer 5

I watch WWE and I've never seen TNA in my life... But probably TNA would win, since all the good wwe wrestlers are going there :P

Answer 6

wwe would still win against tna it would take tna at least 5 more years to be a 100 percent competivie with the wwe. probably once triple h shawn michaels and the undertaker retire

Answer 7

ok tna would def win because wwe is lazy and r just goin through the motions at least tna makes it look more real and also alot of wwe superstars want to go to tna including edge rvd and all sorts of dif variety so there would be trasactions being made so tna would wipe the floor also jim cornet worked under mcmahon in ovw so he knows how "mr grapefruits" works

Answer 8

WWE, no contest. They wouldn't even have to do anything because, 1. TNA is no where near WWE's level. 2. All Vince has to do is shell out some cash (never in short supply) and that'll be that.

Answer 9

I agree with DVD but will add Undertaker, Shawn Michaels, HHH are good wrestlers but others than that it is the pits.

Stone Cold will be back soon, The Rock (Dwayne Johnson) should realize that Vince made him and he needs to come back and help out for a while. Vince needs to bring back Brutus the Barber Beefcake and have the gorgeous "Lady Di" be his valet. Bring back Rick Martel, Lex Luger, Rick Steiner for PPV's. Fire all the current talent in all the brands except for: Chris Benoit, Randy Orton, John Cena, Undertaker, his son in law HHH, Shawn Michaels, Ric Flair, his son Shane if he can and Great Muta. The guys who are ready in OVW bring them up once in a while to fill the gap.

Answer 10

a million. Sting vs Undertaker Undertaker would win, only because of the fact that is Undertaker. 2. Abyss vs Kane Abyss would win. In TNA Abyss is unquestionably pushed as a significant eventer, Abyss would beat Kane. 3. Kurt perspective vs Randy Orton perspective wihtout a doubt 4. Samoa Joe vs Umaga of course Samoa Joe. Umaga only looks like an untalented 0.5-baked version of Joe. 5. Kevin Nash vs the super Khail Kevin Nash. Khali is an embarrasment to wrestling. 6. AJ varieties vs Ray Mysterio AJ varieties would beat Mysterio, he's only a greater valuable worker than Mysterio is. 7. Raven vs Boggyman stupid question. of direction Raven would win. 8. Christian Cage vs Triple H HHH would of course win, yet possibly Christian ought to pull it out some day. 9. Scott Steiner vs Bobby Lashley No contest. those 2 would only cancel one yet another out with tehir loss of skills 10. group 3-D vs Jeff and Matt Hardy Hardyz 11. Rhino vs RVD RHINO definetly 12. Jeff Jarret vs facet facet.

Answer 11

WWE would kick TNA's *** because all TNA has is the X Division and WWE washups. I mean come on, their champion, Christian Cage, used to be a WWE mid-carder if he was lucky.