English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

, surrogate mothers, and other methods of 'bought' children?

Do you think they feel guilty when they had to go through tens of thousands just for one pregnancy when they killed several healthy ones that were for free?

2007-02-17 12:48:37 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

bettysdad: you think a woman can get her cervix pryed open and uterus scraped out on several occasions and walk away unscathed? You need to brush up on your medical info. little man.
broken leg? idiotic analogy and you know it.

2007-02-17 12:55:15 · update #1

cats4ever: If you are just aborting a "chance" than it's a strange 'chance" that ends up as a dead body in a pool of blood, once alive and thriving, now dead because of someone's "Choice" to kill it.

You can't physically kill a "chance" --whatever the hell THAT is, you can however, rip apart a living body with a beating heart and end 'something's' life.

2007-02-17 13:02:24 · update #2

27 answers

Of course they do! If there was someone who had the authority to decide if a particular woman would be allowed to have an invitro, And he asked the woman some questions, and then he said to her " I wont' let u have an invitro because I think u had too many abortions" He would be killing that potential baby. Comprende, The principle involved in abortion is if a woman is going to give birth to a baby, and then the abortionist does something to stop this from happening, he is in effect destroying a human life, therefore it is immoral. Denying a woman the right to have an invitro is essentially an abortion. If you are apposed to all abortions as a matter of christian ethics, you have to allow a woman that u believe has killed her babies a 2nd chance at being a mother.

2007-02-17 13:38:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Well first of all, abortion is NOT a method of birth control. Second, I hope that every time a woman holds the child she WANTED, I hope she wonders about the children she didn't want and ended up murdering. As for women who had multiple abortions who end up getting invitro to have children later in life, that doesn't even deserve a response because the answer is clear! And to think ALL of this could be avoided if men used condoms and if women insisted that the men they're having sex with put one on.

2007-02-17 13:25:57 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 1 0

Although I am pro-choice, I do not think abortion should be used as birth control. Once is a mistake; twice is foolish. Further, I don't think anyone has the "right" of any infertility procedures. They cost thousands of dollars per cycle just for the drugs to produce a viable egg. I speak from experience. We are probably only having one because we can't afford to conceive another. I didn't "buy" my child as you insinuate, I conceived and carried him past term and delivered him. I needed help conceiving just like many need help walking or seeing. It is highly insulting of you to even think for a second that I "bought" him!

Do they feel guilty? Some do, some don't. Some feel guilty for the abortion in the first place. Asking if they have the "right" sounds like they are getting fertility help for free while the rest of us are paying for it.

2007-02-17 12:56:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

it depends, what if it was based on rape, or if she was under age 18 when she got preg. OR what if she wasnt in a situation to provide for the child she carried, but later in life was, is it more right to put a child to suffer then to end it prematurally in the early stages of development, because mind you when an abortion happens, they are aborting the chance of a child- not the child its self because it has not fully developed. Theirs two sides to every story, it may not be right, but it may not be wrong. I think they deserve the right to have a invitro, or even an abortion, under the right circumstances, however since i am no professional i cannot set the circumstances hence.

2007-02-17 12:55:25 · answer #4 · answered by cats4ever2k1 5 · 1 0

Your question will probably spark riots in the religious and moral balconies, spilling out into reason and sanity, along with Liberals and conservatives handing out flyer's on who to vote for.

It doesn't matter what anyone says. A woman body is a woman body. There is no moral, legal or religion that takes authority over a woman choice. It shames me to think that people in this world have so much time to worry about what other people are doing.
Plant a garden, build a church, end world hunger, rally for peace are far more noble and just causes that everyone agrees upon. It is not the right of mortal men and woman to makes choices for other people.

2007-02-17 12:55:04 · answer #5 · answered by GoodWillHunt 3 · 1 1

I understand your compassion for babies but understand not all woman are made to be mothers. These cute cuddly little babies would grow up in an environment worst that the poorest of the poor and their chance of being a successful or even a descent peace loving person is near zero. To raise children with out money or love is considered poor and as you well know to live in our society it cost plenty of money. Women have the sole rights to their reproducing organs it is their body and until that baby is born it is part of that woman, therefore she has the right to have it, give it away, abandon it after birth or simply abort it. If they are to be judged that let your god or their god do that. As long as they pay for the abortion or made responsible to repay the state, it's their personal problem not the citizens of the state. What we should be concerned about is the rising cost of living and the pressure of finding a job or how are we going to fund our kids life, and did we make the right decision to bring them to earth, as we know how evil a place this world is

2007-02-17 13:09:33 · answer #6 · answered by man of ape 6 · 0 1

Im not sure what your asking. Someone has abortions, then decide they want children, cant get pregnant, so they use other methods of getting one, and this isnt right?

I agree, if that is the question. If you have ever had an abortion, you dont deserve the right to "buy" a child now if your body wont allow you to get pregnant again. If you have an abortion, mostly after a couple, your body will actually believe that is what it is supposed to do when you get pregnant, abort it!! That is insane.

Anyways, I dont think that is right at all, no!

2007-02-17 12:52:42 · answer #7 · answered by Bl3ss3dw1thL1f3 4 · 2 1

at the beginning, no longer all circumstances requiring IVF are by way of female components. on occasion MALE components (which includes sperm immobility) require that IVF be complete. so which you are able to not say that *all* of those women are unnaturally forcing their bodies to have babies. Secondly, i've got self assurance VERY FIRMLY that if God does not prefer a woman to have a infant, she would be in a position to no longer. that is only no longer achievable to stand up to God's will. we are able to (and usually do) harm His commandments -- yet there is no longer a individual alive who has ever executed some thing that God did no longer enable her or him to do. added, you're able to evaluate the reality that each physique IVF tries are actually not helpful -- in Canada, the IVF fulfillment value is barely 27%; in the U. S., that is between 27% and 40 two% finding on the lady's age. those are actually not very encouraging figures, exceedingly once you think approximately that each and each attempt expenses a minimum of $12,000! those dismal expenses easily help the theory that God has actively prevented a number of those women from conceiving. lower back, i don't have self assurance that's achievable to frustrate God's will, so if some women conceive, it incredibly is evidence that God has no longer desperate they'll by no ability provide start.

2016-11-23 15:48:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Girl, you're hanging with the wrong people.

Abortion is, has always been and will always be the womans choice - and only hers. It is her body..nobody else can make any decisions concerning it.

Anyone who wants invitro, surrogate or any other method and has the funds can certainly do it.

And, stop with the "pools of blood" stuff. You don't know what you are talking about.

2007-02-17 13:57:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Is this actually a topic? This is very specific. If someone has an abortion and then years later wants to pay to get pregnant I guess its thier money. I doubt they feel any guilt since they didnt have a problem getting the abortion in the 1st place. This is a stupid topic@!
PS women can have multiple abortions and still get pregnant w/out any special help

2007-02-17 14:25:10 · answer #10 · answered by jillmarie2000 5 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers