I sure hope not. Is this why the all-star game is being held in Vegas, instead of Sacramento where it should be? I have a feeling that the moron Maloofs have a plan to move the Kings to Vegas, because they own a bunch of casinos there. That's why they traded away a lot of good players and destroyed a great team. It's a huge shame. The Kings need to stay in Sacramento. They mean a lot to that city. C-Webb is still a hero there, and gets a standing ovation every time he goes back to Arco Arena.
2007-02-17 12:10:29 · 7 answers · asked by GERMANY EURO CHAMPS 3 in Sports ➔ Basketball
Agent Zero: Why do haters like you use every opportunity to diss Eddy Curry and the Knicks? I asked a question about a different topic. So stay on the topic and don't diss the Knicks.
2007-02-17 12:30:16 · update #1
I seriously do not believe the NBA or its owners would allow that move, with Sacramento having a very good record of selling out Kings games and having been in that city 22 yrs and being an elite team early in this decade.
I don't think Commissioner Stern wan ts a team in Vegas, period, because of gambling.
2007-02-17 18:21:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I live near Philly and don't hear much about the western teams. But, the NBA powers-that-be are saying that Las Vegas was a refreshing choice to host the All-Star game, and I have learned that powers-that-be don't always tell us everything that is going on.
I think it is quite probable that the Maloof's are eyeing Vegas as a new home for the Kings but I doubt that the NBA or any major league wants to be the first to place a team in a state that legalized gambling.
If there is a rumor going around about the Kings moving, keep in mind that the Pittsburgh Penguins are rumored to be moving everywhere. It's all a smokescreen, a ploy to get city or state backing for a new arena.
2007-02-17 12:24:55 · answer #2 · answered by Awesome Bill 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The events that went down on the All-famous individual recreation will actual ward off the NBA's pastime in moving to downtown Vegas finished-time. the city wasn't arranged to deal with the human beings and secure practices subject concerns have been the underlying subject matter for the period of the weekend. I examine greater coverage approximately what grew to become into occurring on the Strip, than on the hardwood. additionally, Vegas is the "eye-catching" city that each physique the activities are seeking to get into, notwithstanding there is not any section there yet that should quite accomodate a expert group.
2016-12-17 18:32:07 · answer #3 · answered by erke 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Kings will stay in Sacramento, but I think the Maloofs will sell the Kings in a heartbeat if it meant they could have an expansion franchise for their beloved Vegas.
2007-02-17 12:50:13 · answer #4 · answered by penticton_123 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if they can trade for the great EDDY CURRY!
The franchise EDDY CURRY!
But really, Vegas is a bigger better market with lost of high rollers to buy luxury boxes. If the NBA opens up Vegas the Maloofs will try. Or they'll get an expansion team.
Maybe the expansion tem will get the future Hall of Famer-
EDDY CURRY!
Just jokes... I'm in Chicago. I watched that guy dog it and underachieve for 3-4 years here. At those ticket prices and as high as he went in the draft... I earned the right to diss
2007-02-17 12:17:45 · answer #5 · answered by AgentZero 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
i would assume that they would like to. sacramento might be the capital of cali but doesn't have the same allure of sin city. sac has a couple things going though....kings fans (im one) are really dedicated and loyal 2) the whole gambling thing and putting money on nba games.
if the kings did move it would be a travesty. if they want to move a team, move a team that doesn't get much support...like the atlanta hawks
2007-02-17 12:19:12 · answer #6 · answered by carlos l 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I hope not. The Kings should stay in Sacramento.
2007-02-17 12:23:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋