summararily ousted by both Parties and the Media?
2007-02-17 12:01:27 · 7 answers · asked by ignuusfatuus 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Typically, yes. Ross Peroit, however, did the ousting himself. If he hadn't entered the race, Bush Sr. would have won.
2007-02-17 12:04:54 · answer #1 · answered by J.R. 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Both parties oust third parties and each other. That is the name of the game. The media pays no attention to third parties, because they do not make news and are boring.
2007-02-17 12:04:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
actual. get mutually. Ross Perot grow to be a nil.33 get mutually candidate at the same time as Bush i grow to be operating for a second time period. Clinton grow to be operating hostile to him. Ross grow to be seen a conservative so he split the conservative (Republican) vote with Bush I. while each and each and every of the Liberals (Democrats) voted for Clinton. So even besides the undeniable fact that Clinton did not get the majority vote, he were given more beneficial than Bush I or Perot so he gained. It went like this. Clinton 40 3.01% of the favourite vote. Bush I 37.40 5% Perot 18.ninety one%. Had Perot no longer been in the election, Bush possibly would are growing to be those votes, for a finished of 56.36% which may were a sparkling majority and he would have gained. base line, once you've a nil.33 get mutually candidate, the candidate of the important get mutually maximum like him will see "his" voter base split and he will lose. that ought to take position in 2012 if Hillary makes a call to run. I see that as a threat i imagine Obama is reducing her out of the loop and that i'm keen to guess that around the 2010 election he will say she no longer useful and he will fireplace her. which will be too previous due for her to run for any workplace in the 2010 election and understanding her popularity, she basically would run to make certain Obama loses, as payback.
2016-12-04 07:41:42 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no way for either to "oust" them. Mostly the major parties & the media ignore them.
2007-02-17 12:57:21 · answer #4 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I do believe that. Also, in my opinion, it does no good to even have a third party candidate as long as the election is decided by the electorial college, and not by the popular vote.
2007-02-17 12:09:10 · answer #5 · answered by cajunrescuemedic 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't forget the established government. Our government give millions of tax payer dollars to the duopoly system parties running candidates.--they basically get free air time for their ads on TV.
You have to be a billionaire to run for president third party.
The whole thing is a messed up system to keep the SAME as*hole in office time after time.
gotta keep that status quo!
2007-02-17 12:11:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Especially the so-called Liberal Democratic Media
Unless you are Jew Joe Lieberman
2007-02-17 12:20:15 · answer #7 · answered by Mr. America. 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋