I would like to hear some recent opinions on the bush/hitler comparison since he wants to send more troops... I am going to start it off
- Hitler= land domination VS Bush= money (oil) domination
2007-02-17 11:13:37 · 22 answers · asked by austinblnd 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
indeed i am a american and indeed i a lance bass wannabe
2007-02-17 11:21:28 · update #1
and why is it that in elementry school they make me say the pledge every day and back in the day every morning it was "heil hitler"
2007-02-17 11:25:32 · update #2
and why was ussr bashed for spreading communism and we are happily spreading our own thoughts/opinions and ideas of democracy
2007-02-17 11:29:31 · update #3
One was a crazy lunatic and the other is a crazy lunatic, both occultists that used false flag ops to push into world domination.
2007-02-17 11:17:53 · answer #1 · answered by 33 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Lets see Hitler along with Japan and Italy, were responsible for the deaths of 62 million people in World War 2, neither Germa
ny , nor Italy, nor Japan were attacked first, but they were the aggressors
OK now Bush, not responsible for any deaths, as we were attacked first, and not the aggressor, so if Bush is response for any deaths, after being attacked, then it would be fair to say that Roosevelt was responsible for the 62 million deaths, instead of Hitler, in World War 2
The only difference is that the American media was for America back then, now all they want to do is stir up trouble and would love to report that America is No longer a nation, i feel the American media is responsible for 9/11 as much as the terrorist
If you want to ask a good question, ask American media vs. Hitler, they both spread lies and half truths, and both are into the propaganda business
2007-02-17 19:41:59 · answer #2 · answered by DukeofDixie 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hitler was more intelligent (though also a mad man which Bush is not) and had a vision - albeit a sick one - whereas Bush just wants the cash. Hitler was also more honest (is this a good thing?) and made his ideas clear whereas Bush is a liar. Bush planned and carried out an attack on his own nation which I think Hitler did too.
Both are insanely selfish and have killed lots of people.
2007-02-17 19:49:03 · answer #3 · answered by airmonkey1001 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bush,Hitler & Elie Wiesel are very much alike they are some type of human But you must visualize the USA as a giant engine that supports most of the world and this engine runs on oil, cheap labor, super rich people & the church.
If the engine runs low or out of oil, it stops and so do we.
Be it a good thing or bad that's the fact.
2007-02-17 19:29:55 · answer #4 · answered by man of ape 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
GWB out done Hitler in the magnitude of billions, trillions and wheverllions.
There is no comparison, and there will never have any such man in the future.
Unfortunately, he also gives American people a permanent black mark in history.
2007-02-17 23:39:46 · answer #5 · answered by Tia T 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is a great American President(note:as being elected to two terms. If you dispute this I remind you of Bill Clinton who wasn't half the man, but thought he was).
Hitler was a twisted dictator like Saddam Hussein who killed millions of innocent people and tried to take over the world and started a World War to do it.
Bush=Fighting Terrorism
Hitler=Caused Terror
2007-02-17 19:24:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I guess he should be convinced to hire the occult, organize the peepshow, and finally commit suicide. I have no opinion to frame your inquest.
You aren't any different. Eh? Like, 23 hours ago you dominated your own Q&A panel with powerful ideas, although very few words. In future days, your comparisons can lead to a backlash against people who you never met. The internet seems like a safe world where death, famine, and life can be the result of any idea that you speak. The word is consist.
There, I gave you some satire and some cynicism. Now can I have my Yahoo! points?
2007-02-17 19:28:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
You're sixteen and going to one of those urban high schools where you don't learn to read and write but you do suffer an endless stream of far left-wing propaganda from your "teachers", right?
Conflating Bush and Hitler is the work of a birdbrain. Try and grow up before it's too late!
2007-02-17 19:20:09 · answer #8 · answered by Fast Eddie B 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Hitler did not only want land for it's natural resources to feed his war machinery, but also,he wanted to create a master race.
Mr. Bush, not only wants to get Iraq's oil, but wants to create a democratic society world wide!
Fortunately, Hitler failed, and fortunately, Mr. Bush will soon become a hasbeen.
2007-02-17 19:26:28 · answer #9 · answered by billy brite 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Hitler spoke better English
2007-02-17 19:47:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋