It's not possible to get at the ultimate beginning, the theories actually have nothing to say about that because they break down at the creation point of the current laws -- and scientists, if they are being honest, will admit it. The best theories can do is to push back in time the parts we can explain.
No one believes in a contraction cycle anymore -- that was always a dumb idea, and we now see that "quintessence" will cause the universe to continue expanding forever until everything is dead and cold.
Current speculative thinking is that in a primordial multiverse of branes, two branes collided resulting in a release of energy that was the big bang. But of course that tells you nothing about where the multiple universes came from or how long they were around.
2007-02-17 11:09:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by KevinStud99 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Edwin Hubble got here across that the universe is visibly increasing via crimson shifting of light from distant components. considering that then his discovery has been shown a large many cases via others making use of a similar and additionally diverse techniques. simply by fact the universe is seen to be increasing as we communicate, then the day previous the universe replaced into smaller. Extrapolating backwards it form of feels that the universe replaced into as quickly as very small. The information discovered so a great way would not point out the inspiration of the factors for the universe, nor does the information let us know something of activities happening in the previous its growth. particularly than many times reciting this qualifying sentence, the vast bang is often basically stated (incorrectly) simply by fact the initiating or "creation" of the universe. television documentaries don't be concerned to make the excellence. however no longer technically superb, for many sensible discussions of the physics of the universe, it relatively is high quality. For discussions on the inspiration of the universe, the errors is unacceptable. ? regardless of the actuality that some thoughts have the initiating of the vast bang simply by fact the initiating of the universe, there is not any medical requirement for or against an infinitely long previous. .
2016-10-02 07:43:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
In order for all celestial bodies to move it is required that a containment which sets the boundary of the Universe be constricted.
Therefore What ever created substance exist at the boundary of the Universe which makes it finite is the mechanism responsible for constricting the Universe ;thus is the cause of all motion and energy which we call gravity.Perhaps this substance is what existed before the formation of the Universe. Big bang theory makes no assumptions about what existed before.Neverthe less its just a theory whose premises live on a very thin line.
No mention in the 1st chapeter of Genesis about a Big Bang theory.This Hystorical account Indicates that Creation was a supernatural event taking place and forming the architecture of the Universe of a construction velocity which was supernatural with a supernatural formation time. The supernatural time dialation is alluded in Einstein's Dilation formula. What appears from our frame of reference to us as a long time was really a short timeat the beginging of the Universe.
.
Only our Creator Existed from eternity and will continue to exist for eternity. Not neccessarely the UNiverse.
2007-02-17 11:35:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by goring 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, if the big bang theory is correct as it stands (which, if history teaches us anything it isn't), then you can't ask yourself what was before the big bang. Time was created with the big bang, so there was no "before" the big bang. And your answer is not at all an obvious answer or even a correct answer. It is entirely possible that there was a beginning to our universe with nothing before it.
2007-02-17 14:23:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Chris S 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Another train of thought is that there simply wasn't anything before the Big Bang. The mass that caused the Big Bang was just always there.
2007-02-17 11:19:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by siegfriedbalmung 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I have studied dimensional studies where it teaches you to think in the fourth dimension. Interesting stuff.
Again, a quick read into understanding why we can't understand things that go beyond our three dimensions.
Imagine a flatland, where the beings live in two dimensions. They live in a 2 dimension world that is a flat plane. (as a table top).
They can move foreward and back, ldft and right, every direction except up and down because that is a dimension that doesnt exist to them.
I can reach down and pick them up out of their world and they cannot even point in my direction.
Now think of a being in the fourth dimension able to do that to us in our 3 dimensional world. This may be why we don't understand everything , because the three dimensions are a small part of what actually is here.
2007-02-17 11:09:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Father Ted 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yeah. It's a closed system.The Bang, the expansion, the stable period, the contraction, the Bang again. Over and over. Endless. Eternal.
2007-02-17 10:56:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Dorothy and Toto 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Their is some evidence that goes into people believing in the Universe. For one, celestial object far away that are moving further away. This is showing that the space between us and some objects is expanding and so, the universe is expanding.
2007-02-17 14:11:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
One day the universe did not exist and one day it will go out of existence.
It is a finite entity that one day will stop and never happen again.
2007-02-17 13:18:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Billy Butthead 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sounds very reasonable, but how do you test it?
2007-02-17 10:56:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋