Why do Liberals support running away like cowards and hiding from the enemy?

Answer 1

Because they are naive enough to think that we can reason with the islamonazis!!!!! Hitler could not be reasoned with and neither can these jacka.s.s.e.s!!!!! Just ask France!!!! They wanted to "appease Hitler" and we pulled their fat out of the fire.We are fighting for are way of life and our freedoms and liberals think we can talk things out.Stupidity rears its ugly head once again!!!!!!!!!!!

Answer 2

"Iraq Was a war-of-choice distraction from the war of necessity against al Qaeda."

-Report from the Army War College Strategic Studies Department.

As far as the Iraq war, it is not now, was not then and never will be a piece of the war on terrorism, it's a domestic civil war. We should allocate many of the troops in Iraq to Afghanistan which actually is part of the war on terrorism. Their the Taliban are retaking ground, if we had pacified Afghanistan which doesn't have the ethnic fracture the way Iraq does, we could have used it for a base to slip into Pakistan and get Bin Laden, and Al-Ziwahiryi and behead them in their sleep, assuming we hadn't gotten them while they where still in Afghanistan. We also could have eradicated the poppy crop there which produces about 200 metric tons of heroin.

PtH

Answer 3

Unless you've asked this question from Iraq, you have nothing to say about cowardice.

A few years ago saying anything against the Iraq war was akin to treason, and the majority of Americans were all but willing to string you up for dissenting.

But a small number of people spoke against it, and because they did... 72% of Americans do not support the war today.

Speaking against the war took a lot of moral courage.

Most Liberals would be as willing to fight a just war as any Republican would... and many are fighting an unjust war in Iraq today. 48% of the soldiers in Iraq right now are Republican. The rest are made up of men and women who are aligned with other parties.

But Iraq is not a just war. It's a corrupt war, and while the soldiers over there are courageous, they're also being used by the Republican Government of the USA.

Answer 4

Nah ur incorrect there, it is a cloak and dagger aspect with N Korea, we are sitting again and watching them, now you need to keep in suggestions the loopy little self proclaimed dictator of that u . s ., he's quite more beneficial imbalanced than what Saddam hussein grow to be/is. Saddam did not educate his playing cards like Kim Yun did, plus that short little basatard has a very tremendous military, do not get me incorrect besides the undeniable fact that, we do have some the most ideal experienced Soliders in the international, that is actual the international. So if the time got here, we would play troublesome ball with the little referred to off runt. yet we even ought to keep in suggestions he's taking area in ball with Hugo Chavez, yet another self proclaimed Dictator in Venezuela. He has no longer confirmed his playing cards yet, yet has shown he has the money to Finance getting what he needs with all of his dirty Oil money..imagine about it, who has the most important educate of stress in the Gulf in the present day we do...

Answer 5

No matter the political party....facing bullets and bombs is cold and hard. I don't want my children, family members and friends facing that if it's not absolutely necessary.

And since I've never heard of a Bush family member fighting and/or being killed or injured in Iraq, I'd say that he doesn't want his kids and family members there either.

I could believe that he truly believes in this war if his twin daughters were over there fighting along side every one else.

I would feel differently about the nature of his committment.

And no, I don't want to see his daughters or any americans over there risking their lives.

Answer 6

They still haven't seem to understand the victory dances being done right now over the Democratic decision to try and end the war isn't a good thing! They hate confrontations unless it's with a republican but should they get what they want I wonder how they'll take to confronting the enemy on our own soil?

Answer 7

What happen to Q&A and dialogue? The bulk of this stuff in USA Politics & Gov just seems to be about venting. What does it accomplish? No one seems any happier for it ... the postings never improve. No one is informing anyone. If anyone even had a valid point sandwiched in the criticism, it would get lost. What a disappointment.

I see Y!A is limiting thumbs up and thumbs down ... removing some of them after placement. I noticed because I check back to see additional answers on some questions today, hoping for some real input and that's when I saw the thumbs up and downs had been removed. It was kind of pleasant actually. It was like seeing a wall freshly painted after gangland graffetti has been removed.

Ranting questions make it difficult to take a serious look at the issue you are trying to address? For example: I'm not sure what your point is beyond liberal bashing. I know liberals who are soldiers stationed in Iraq. What was your point again?

Answer 8

We don't--but (in case you missed the news the last 4 years--Iraq was not linked to the terrorists. Furthermore, the whole terrist "war" is a farce. If Bush were serious, he'd have done something to protect our borders and ports.

But he hasn't--because Bush knows the whole "terrorist thing is a boogyman. I f the terrorists wanted to attack us again, they could have done so at any time--just walked across the border. And they proved in Madrid and London they can hit if they want to.

So Bush's "war on terror" is a fake.

Answer 9

My metaphor for that is like when your teenage child steals your car and wreck it, and you give him/her a 10 minute time out in the corner, instead of stronger reinforced discipline.

That type of soft attitude towards major concerns will not send out the right message that it requires. Their history of soft diplomacy has contributed and emboldened the terrorist organizations around the world to attack any Americans, at any given time and for no real reason but hate. ie...our ship, Beirut all missed opportunities.

Answer 10

They don't Liberals like know the person they are fighting is worth fighting instead of just following orders without thinking about it!
Interesting thought: in the 1760s a liberal = someone who thought the British were unfair and needed a lesson, Conservative ( Republican) didn't.

Answer 11

no you have it wrong they don't run away they sit there discussing
how they can sit and reason with the enemy. I have been waiting for them to actually sit down with the enemy and talk out a real solution.